Search Site
Menu
NJ Supreme Court to Hear Argument in Environmental Spill Case on Oct. 6

NJ High Court to Decide if 6 Year Statute of Limitation Applies to Environmental Cleanup Cost Recovery Claim Under the Spill Act

On October 6, 2014, the Supreme Court of New Jersey will be hearing oral argument in Morristown Assoc. v Grant Oil Co., 432 N.J.Super 287 (App. Div. 2013), a case involving the statute of limitations applicable to claims arising under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (“Spill Act”). The Morristown case, which involves a lawsuit filed by the owner of a shopping center to recover environmental cleanup costs from oil companies and a dry cleaner, made waves last year for its ruling that Spill Act claims were subject to a six-year statute of limitation. Before the 2013 Morristown ruling, it had been widely understood that there was no statute of limitation on Spill Act claims.

The Spill Act is the centerpiece of environmental legislation in New Jersey. It is the law that requires those responsible for discharging hazardous substance to clean up contaminated property or reimburse others who have incurred cleanup costs (including the State of New Jersey through the Department of Environmental Protection). In Morristown, the plaintiff alleges that contamination of the soil and groundwater at its property was caused by a leaking underground storage tank (UST). The Appellate Division held that the claim was time barred because it was brought outside the six year period imposed by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, which began running in 1999 when the shopping center should have realized that contamination may have existed. The Court reasoned that enforcing the statute of limitations does not prevent a diligent plaintiff from recovering contribution under Spill Act claims; it just requires that a plaintiff under the Spill Act file in a timely manner. 

Supreme Court Ruling Could Have Widespread Impact for Industrial Property Owners, Business Community, and (Re)Developers

The ruling has the potential for wide-spread impact on hazardous site remediation, brownfield development, and other pending environmental litigation matters. The potential for state-wise impact by this ruling is so strong, it led to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) to file amicus briefs, requesting that the State Supreme Court overturn the Appellate Division’s ruling. On behalf of its non-profit client, the Passaic River Coalition, Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich P.C. also filed an amicus brief.

The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the Morristown case on Monday, October 6, 2014. The oral argument will stream live on the judiciary’s website: https://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/webcast/

Our firm will be following the progress of this case very closely to ensure we can provide our clients with the best service in cases affected by the outcome of this ruling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • Contaminant May Have Leaked into Aquifer at Site of Planned LNG Terminal in Gibbstown. https://t.co/Q1yObrGP5J
    1 week ago
  • Lawmakers move to extend permits for projects derailed by COVID-19. https://t.co/9xw8O2tB1W
    3 weeks ago
  • Governor Murphy signs executive order relaxing deadlines for issuing environmental permits during the COVID-19 pand… https://t.co/d1GD05v82Y
    3 weeks ago
  • New Jersey and coalition of states file lawsuit to block EPA's "Navigable Waters Protection Rule." https://t.co/VOS7HkKCeu
    3 weeks ago

Recent Blog Posts

Frequently Asked Questions About New Jersey Natural Resource Damages Cases

For many years, natural resource damages claims represented a fairly insignificant part of the environmental law landscape nationally as well as here in New Jersey. When seeking damages for a
Read More
Frequently Asked Questions About New Jersey Natural Resource Damages Cases

EPA ROLES BACK FEDERAL WETLANDS PROTECTIONS – AND GETS SUED FOR DOING SO

This past January, the federal government rolled back its protections of wetlands authorized under the United States Clean Water Act. The “Navigable Waters Protection Rule,” effective on June 22, 2020,
Read More
EPA ROLES BACK FEDERAL WETLANDS PROTECTIONS – AND GETS SUED FOR DOING SO

Our Drinking Water and Water Bodies Prevailed in The Maui decision

When most of us think of Maui, we envision great weather, lush vegetation, tiki bars and beaches. The very last thing that comes to mind are sewer plants and the
Read More
Our Drinking Water and Water Bodies Prevailed in The Maui decision

Published Reports Claims EPA is Hiding True Lead Levels in Drinking Water

APM Reports (from American Public Media) has just released a report on May 4, 2020 that raises some critical questions not only about the quality of the water we are
Read More
Published Reports Claims EPA is Hiding True Lead Levels in Drinking Water

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form