By Brittany W. DeBord | Published November 6, 2017 | Posted in Constitutional Law, Environmental & Natural Resources, Environmental Cleanup Cost Recovery, Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act) | Leave a comment
Search Site
10 Jefferson Plaza, Suite 400 | Princeton, New Jersey 08540
845 Third Avenue, 6th Floor | New York, New York 10022
845 Third Avenue, 6th Floor | New York, New York 10022
Call for a consultation
732-355-1311
Category Archive
Environmental Cleanup Cost Recovery
1 - 10 of 14
Page 1 of 2
⟩ New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment concerning the Environment
On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, New Jersey voters will be asked to decide on a state constitutional amendment regarding the use of natural resource damages collected by the State in environmental contamination cases. New Jersey has the authority to collect damages for restoration of natural resources under the New Jersey Water Pollution Control Act, N.J.S.A. Read More
Read MoreLaches to defeat a private party contribution claim under the Spill Act?
In 2015, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that private party contribution claims under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (the “Spill Act”) are not time barred by a statute of limitations. See Morristown Associates v. Grant Oil Co., 220 N.J. 360 (2015). Accordingly, private claims for contribution pursuant to the Spill Act Read More
Read MoreWhen Remediation Goes Wrong: Appellate Division Says Remedial Efforts May Constitute Evidence Spoliation
In 18-01 Pollitt Drive, LLC v. Engel, the Appellate Division held that the discard of piping, a sump pit, and concrete flooring during remediation constitutes spoliation of material, physical evidence. Docket No. A-4833-13T3 (App. Div. Oct. 31, 2016). Spoliation of evidence occurs when a litigant has “hidden, destroyed, or lost relevant evidence and thereby impaired Read More
Read MoreAppellate Division Sheds Light on Procedural Requirements for Certain Environmental Claims
A recent Appellate Division case shed some light on certain procedural requirements for environmental claims. In Bradley v. Kovelesky, et al., Docket No.: A-0423-14T4, the claims before the court pertained to an 8.3 acre property in Middletown Township. Lawrence Carton, deceased June 2007, purchased the property January 2006. Carton set out to build a residence Read More
Read MoreThe Path(way) to Reinvestigation: MassDEP Revisits Closed TCE Sites
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (“MassDEP”) recently proposed to reopen closed waste sites based on available data that suggests levels of trichloroethylene (“TCE”) may exceed current United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) toxicity values. While the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) has not yet proposed a similar endeavor, it is worth following Read More
Read MoreNo Time Limit to Sue for Environmental Cleanup Costs in New Jersey
No Statute of Limitations Applies to Private Spill Act Claims The regulated community breathed a collective sigh of relief when New Jersey’s highest court released its decision today in Morristown Associates v. Grant Oil Co., — NJ — (2015), where it held that the state’s general six-year statute of limitations is not applicable to private “contribution” lawsuits Read More
Read MoreOil Company Not Liable to Neighbor for Leaking Underground Tanks
Oil Company Not Liable to Neighbor for Leaking Underground Tanks Gasoline Station Owner Not Liable for Damage to Neighbor Who Did Not Properly Allege Harm A property owner whose investment property was contaminated by a leaking gasoline station next door had his property damage case dismissed because he failed to completely allege all of his Read More
Read MoreNJ Supreme Court to Hear Argument in Environmental Spill Case on Oct. 6
NJ High Court to Decide if 6 Year Statute of Limitation Applies to Environmental Cleanup Cost Recovery Claim Under the Spill Act On October 6, 2014, the Supreme Court of New Jersey will be hearing oral argument in Morristown Assoc. v Grant Oil Co., 432 N.J.Super 287 (App. Div. 2013), a case involving the statute Read More
Read MoreNJ Supreme Court: Environmental Litigation Over Cleanup Cost Allocation May Proceed
Sets New Environmental Law Precedent New Jersey’s highest court has ruled that in private contribution claims arising under the Spill Act, “a party determined to be a discharger and held responsible for the cost of cleanup by the DEP is entitled to bring a contribution claim against other potentially responsible parties before the final tally Read More
Read MoreU.S. District Court Allows NJ Superfund Site Suit to Proceed
Earlier this month, U.S. District Court Judge Michael Shipp ruled that lead smelting company NL Industries (formerly National Lead) may maintain an action against over two dozen defendants for contribution relating to the clean-up of the Raritan Bay Slag Superfund site. The site in question includes the Laurence Harbor seawall adjacent to Waterfront Park in Read More
Read More
1 - 10 of 14
Page 1 of 2
⟩
Our Attorneys
Recent Blog Posts
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit
By C. Michael Gan / July 30, 2020
In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances
By Michael Camastra / July 8, 2020
On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Should the Association Pool be Reopened During COVID-19?
By C. Michael Gan / June 29, 2020
As the State of New Jersey slowly recovers from COVID-19, Governor Murphy has begun to reopen the state and relax restrictions on businesses and activities. Under Executive Order 153, outdoor
Read More
Federal Appeals Court Tosses Case by the Waterfront Commission Against the New Jersey Governor
By Stuart Lieberman / June 15, 2020
Federal caselaw has long made it clear that states may not be sued in federal court unless they have consented to such suit or unless Congress has narrowly subjected a
Read More
Contact Our Firm
