Search Site
NJDEP Overreached in Seizing "Rotten Egg" Smelling Fenimore Landfill

Appeals Court Overturns NJDEP Seizure of Fenimore Landfill

The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court concluded that the Fenimore Landfill, owned and operated by Strategic Environmental Partners LLC (SEP), should not have been closed and seized by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) just thirty minutes after a new law was passed governing old landfills and hydrogen sulfide gas emissions that can lead to “rotten egg” odors. This case, involving various New Jersey environmental laws, was decided on November 13, 2014. A copy of the decision a available by following this link: Strategic Environmental Partners v NJDEP.

Roxbury, New Jersey Landfill Emits “Rotten Egg” Smell Prompting 600+ Complaints

The Fenimore Landfill has been a solid waste landfill in Roxbury, New Jersey since the 1950s. Fenimore ceased operations in 1977, but was never closed or capped. It was purchased by Strategic Environmental Partners (SEP), a company that wanted to cap the landfill and install a solar power generating plant above the waste. The closure plan for the landfill allowed SEP to accept approved fill material to grade and make the site suitable for the solar installation. In 2012, the NJDEP found that SEP had not complied with obligations of its landfill closure plan and ordered SEP to stop receiving fill at the landfill. The main concern was that SEP was receiving large amounts of ground wallboard (also called gypsum board) that created noxious hydrogen sulfide gas releases as it decomposed, resulting in a “rotten egg” odor that wafted throughout the surrounding area. NJDEP received about 600 complaints from nearby residents about the odor and allegedly related nose, eye, and skin irritation.

NJDEP Issued An “Emergency Order” and Seized the Landfill

While a summary action filed by SEP was pending in Superior Court, NJDEP issued administrative orders and penalties against SEP for violations of air pollution laws. Then, on June 26, 2013, Governor Christie signed legislation governing closure of 600 old landfills in the state, including setting standards for hydrogen sulfide emissions. N.J.S.A. 13:1E-125.1-125.9. The new law authorized NJDEP to issue an “emergency order” when a landfill presents “an imminent threat to the environment or public health and safety.” On the same day the law became effective, NJDEP issued an emergency order stopping SEP from accepting new file. NJDEP sieved control of the landfill within 30 minutes of when the Governing signed the legislation.

NJDEP Exceeded Its Authority in the Face of Brand New Landfill Law

After the NJDEP denied a stay of the order, SEP filed an appeal. The Appellate Division found that the NJDEP lacked authority to issue the emergency order because the new law only allowed NJDEP to require SEP to take corrective action. There was no authority for NJDEP to seize the landfill or halt its operation without first going to the trial court for injunctive relief. Moreover, even if NJDEP could seize the landfill without first going to court, there was no evidence that SEP was currently violating the hydrogen sulfide standard that was established just 30 minutes earlier. Instead, the Appellate Division found that NJDEP’s action, even if permitted, would have been an “unlawful retroactive application.”

Legacy Landfill Law Is Not “Special Legislation” Aimed at This Party or Location

The Appellate Division did not address certain constitutional arguments raised by SEP. However, the Court did address whether the Legacy Landfill was “special legislation,” which is a law that arbitrarily separates some persons (or entities) from others and places limitations on them with no rational purpose. The Court explained that the law served the legitimate purpose of preserving the environment, and that it is applicable to all legacy landfills and not specifically directed at SEP. Finally, the Court found that the classification of legacy landfills (apart from other landfills) is rationally related to the purpose of New Jersey’s Solid Waste Management Act.

In light of the fact that there was no administrative record on the matter, the Appellate Division remanded the case for a plenary hearing at the trial court level, giving the NJDEP the opportunity present evidence to support a finding that the landfill presents a threat under the new law, and giving SEP the right to present contrary evidence. 

Environmental Attorneys for Businesses Facing Administrative Orders and Penalty Assessments

When faced with environmental administrative orders or penalty assessments from the NJDEP, members of the regulated community should seek the advice of an environmental lawyer experienced with NJDEP rules and regulations. It is also important to find counsel with appellate experience who can challenge the appropriateness of NJDEP’s orders before the courts. Our teams of environmental attorneys offer clients a breadth of experience in regulatory compliance, environmental enforcement and appellate advocacy.

Act Quickly and Consult with an Environmental Lawyer Before Time to Challenge an Administrative Decision Runs Out

The time limits to comply with or appeal regulatory and administrative agency determinations can be short. Do not delay in getting the legal advice you need. Contact our New Jersey environmental lawyers for a consultation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New parks, trails will reconnect region to Camden's two rivers.
    2 days ago
  • Environmental Groups Seek NJ Supreme Court Review of Exxon Settlement.
    1 week ago
  • Pompton Lakes officials oppose Superfund for DuPont site.
    2 weeks ago
  • Sparta holds decision on Glen Lake Dam case.
    2 weeks ago

Recent Blog Posts

United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, et al. 583 U.S. ____ (2018) Decided January 22, 2018 Since the passing of the Clean Water Act in 1972, the definition of “the waters
Read More
United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment concerning the Environment

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, New Jersey voters will be asked to decide on a state constitutional amendment regarding the use of natural resource damages collected by the State in
Read More
New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment  concerning the Environment

Appellate Division Case Demonstrates Importance of Carefully Negotiated Escrow Agreements

Real estate transactions involving commercial and residential properties frequently employ the use of escrow agreements to address potential environmental issues.  This practice is widespread in New Jersey and it permits
Read More
Appellate Division Case Demonstrates Importance of Carefully Negotiated Escrow Agreements

NJDEP Updates Soil Remediation Standards for 19 Contaminants

Effective September 18, 2017, new soil remediation standards govern the cleanup of contaminated sites in New Jersey.  The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) recently updated remedial standards for
Read More
NJDEP Updates Soil Remediation Standards for 19 Contaminants

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form