Search Site
Menu
Appellate Division Takes Victory in Wetlands Takings Case from the State

A state appeals court reversed the dismissal of a regulatory takings law suit on April 17th in the case of LH Wagner Realty Corp and Leo H Wagner v. the DEP, Docket Number A-3441-12T4. The procedural history of the case is a bit confusing, but the essence of it concerns the effect of a state DEP order requiring restoration of wetlands on three parcels of property owned by the plaintiffs.

Under a substantial body of case law over the last 30 years, regulatory actions that effectively render real property useless may result in a right to compensation by the government under the “Takings Clause” of the Fifth Amendment of United States Constitution, and applicable portions of the New Jersey Constitution. The plaintiff property owner made that claim against the DEP because the restored wetlands resulted in extremely limited buildable space remaining on the impacted properties, therefore making them worthless.

In response the DEP moved to dismiss the matter, alleging that a DEP order alone did not constitute an actionable taking and that the case was filed out of time. The trial court did not just rely on the pleadings when it dismissed the case, but also relied on matters outside of the pleadings, effectively treating the motion as one for summary judgment. That Court dismissed the claims with prejudice.

In reversing the dismissal, the Appellate Division found that the trial court improperly focused on the ultimate merits of the case. The Appellate Division ruled “at this stage in the proceeding, however, the [lower] Court should not have concerned itself with plaintiff’s ability to prove their allegations.” The Court also held that if dismissal was appropriate, it should have been without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff an opportunity to amend its pleadings.

Yes, the Lord giveth and the DEP sometimes taketh away; when it does, it may result in the filing of a takings lawsuit by the property owner. A suit that the DEP may not be able to so quickly taketh away itself.

* * *

At Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich our legal team is well versed in the ins and outs of regulatory takings, wetlands development, and working with the DEP to resolve discrepancies in actions. If you are having issues with development, wetlands, zoning, or permitting, please contact our office to see how we can assist you.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    3 months ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    3 months ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    4 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    5 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form