Search Site
New Jersey Appeals Court Finds Christie Administration Illegally Repealed RGGI-Related Climate Regulations

The New Jersey Appellate Division recently held that the state was not permitted to repeal administrative regulations without going through the formal rule making processes of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), even if the subject regulations are tied to a regional cooperative effort in which the state is no longer participating. In the case, captioned In re Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, docket number A-4878-11T4, environmental organizations brought suit to challenge the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (NJDEP) repeal of regulations adopted in order to facilitate New Jersey’s membership in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), arguing that the procedures outlined in the APA applied but were ignored by the NJDEP.

In 2005, New Jersey signed on to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with six other states recognizing the growing concerns of climate change and the serious risks it poses to human health and the natural environment, thereby creating the RGGI. The seven Mid-Atlantic states then agreed to implement a carbon dioxide (CO2) trading program designed to prevent the increase of CO2 emissions in the region and to create an organization which would provide the states with technical assistance in meeting their emissions-capping goals. The RGGI now counts nine East Coast states among its membership: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont.

Under the MOU, the emissions-limitations goals of RGGI were to be achieved through a system of compliance periods, offsets, allocations, and credits. In New Jersey, the program was implemented through the Global Warming Response Act and the Global Warming Solutions Fund Act (the “Solutions Act”), both enacted in 2007. The Solutions Act provided the NJDEP with authority to promulgate regulations creating the necessary administrative framework to allow New Jersey to participate in the RGGI CO2-limitation program. Those regulations, finalized in 2008, capped CO2 emissions at a set amount and established allowances that were auctioned off to CO2 generators, mainly power plants.

Despite several years of successful auctions and allowances trading between member states, Governor Chris Christie announced that New Jersey would be withdrawing from the RGGI in 2011. The administration also posted a notice to the NJDEP’s website stating that New Jersey CO2 generators would no longer be obligated to comply with the requirements of the regulations promulgated alongside New Jersey’s entry into the RGGI.

Two environmental groups, Environment New Jersey and the National Resource Defense Council, appealed the agency’s action, arguing that the NJDEP violated the APA when it repealed the regulations without going through the formal rule making process set out in the APA. In response, the NJDEP argued that formal rule making under the APA was not required because the only purpose of the regulations was to implement New Jersey’s participation in the RGGI.

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division held that the regulations were worded “quite broadly” and could be read to have effect notwithstanding New Jersey’s affiliation with RGGI. Therefore, if the NJDEP wished to repeal or otherwise alter the regulations, formal action pursuant to the procedures outlined in the APA was necessary. Accordingly, the Appellate Division remanded the matter to the NJDEP to take action under the APA to address the regulations. The Court also stayed enforcement of the regulations to allow the NJDEP time to comply with the decision.

While the largely procedural ruling does not require that New Jersey rejoin the RGGI, it has been seen by some as an opportunity to address concerns over climate change through legislation and rule making.

The attorneys at Lieberman & Blecher, P.C., who regularly assist clients with concerns relating to compliance with state environmental regulations, will be closely following the developments in New Jersey’s approach to climate change.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New parks, trails will reconnect region to Camden's two rivers.
    20 hours ago
  • Environmental Groups Seek NJ Supreme Court Review of Exxon Settlement.
    1 week ago
  • Pompton Lakes officials oppose Superfund for DuPont site.
    1 week ago
  • Sparta holds decision on Glen Lake Dam case.
    1 week ago

Recent Blog Posts

United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, et al. 583 U.S. ____ (2018) Decided January 22, 2018 Since the passing of the Clean Water Act in 1972, the definition of “the waters
Read More
United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment concerning the Environment

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, New Jersey voters will be asked to decide on a state constitutional amendment regarding the use of natural resource damages collected by the State in
Read More
New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment  concerning the Environment

Appellate Division Case Demonstrates Importance of Carefully Negotiated Escrow Agreements

Real estate transactions involving commercial and residential properties frequently employ the use of escrow agreements to address potential environmental issues.  This practice is widespread in New Jersey and it permits
Read More
Appellate Division Case Demonstrates Importance of Carefully Negotiated Escrow Agreements

NJDEP Updates Soil Remediation Standards for 19 Contaminants

Effective September 18, 2017, new soil remediation standards govern the cleanup of contaminated sites in New Jersey.  The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) recently updated remedial standards for
Read More
NJDEP Updates Soil Remediation Standards for 19 Contaminants

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form