Search Site
Menu
Extension of Extensions: Deadline to Apply for Extension of Remedial Investigation Deadline Postponed

The May 7, 2014 Remedial Investigation Deadline Under New Jersey’s Site Remediation Reform Act

The Site Remediation Reform Act (“SRRA”), N.J.S.A. 58:10C-1 et seq., requires that the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection undertake direct oversight of a remediation of certain contaminated sites when the person responsible for conducting the remediation fails to complete the remedial investigation of the entire contaminated site on or before May 7, 2014. This statutory requirement, which can be found at N.J.S.A. 58:10C-27(a)(3), to complete the remedial investigation on or before May 7, 2014 applies to:

  •  all discharges/contaminated areas of concern (“CAOC”) at the site where the contamination was identified on or before May 7, 1999, and
  •  all discharges/CAOCs at the site where the contamination should have been identified due to an obligation to complete a preliminary assessment and/or site investigation on or before May 7, 1999, pursuant to the Industrial Site Recovery Act Rules (N.J.A.C. 7:26B), the Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances Rules (N.J.A.C. 7:14B), an Administrative or Court Order, Remediation Agreement, or a Spill Act Directive.

In other words, a large majority of contaminated sites in New Jersey are statutorily required to complete the painstaking process of a site wide remedial investigation in two months from today.

Possible Remedial Investigation Deadline Extensions to May 7, 2016

On January 17, 2014, Governor Christie signed P.L.2013, c.283, which allows certain persons responsible for conducting remediation to qualify for a two year extension, until May 7, 2016, to complete the remedial investigation. To qualify for this extension, the applicant must certify to the following:

  •  A LSRP has been retained to conduct a remediation of the site;
  •  Any remediation requirements included in mandatory remediation timeframes adopted pursuant to N.J.S.A. 58:10C-28 for the site have been met at the time of the certification;
  •  Technically complete submissions have been made in compliance with all rules and regulations for site remediation, as applicable, for the:

(a) initial receptor evaluation,

(b) immediate environmental concern source control report,

(c) light non-aqueous phase liquid interim remedial measure report,

(d) preliminary assessment report, and

(e) site investigation report;

  •   A remediation funding source has been established, if required of the applicant by the Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10B-3;
  •  If a remediation funding source is not required to be established by the applicant pursuant to law, then a remediation trust fund for the estimated cost of the remedial investigation has been established pursuant to the standards established in section N.J.S.A. 58:10B-3;
  •  Any oversight costs imposed by the Department, known at the time of the application, and not in dispute on January 17, 2014 (date of enactment of P.L.2013, c.283), have been paid to the Department; and
  •  The annual fees imposed by the Department for the remediation and, as applicable, remediation funding source surcharges imposed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 58:10B-11 have been paid to the Department.

The March 21, 2014: Application Due for Extension of the Remedial Investigation Deadline

All applications for an extension must be submitted to the Department by March 7, 2014. However, according to an e-mail circulated by the NJDEP’s SRRA listserv, the NJDEP will continue to accept “May 7, 2014 Remedial Investigation Complete Timeframe Extension Form” requests through the NJDEP Online portal through March 21, 2014. This extension is due to the large number of weather-related closings that have occurred this winter in New Jersey.

Similar to other portions of the LSRP program that have been unveiled since May 7, 2009, it is unclear how many contaminated sites will end up back in direct oversight of the NJDEP. Furthermore, if that number is large, it is unclear if the NJDEP will have the manpower to oversee all of the non-compliant sites.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New report finds that significant offshore wind capacity exists along the Atlantic coast. https://t.co/EQG8d5VMw2
    3 weeks ago
  • The Murphy Administration plans to spend $200 million on wind port. https://t.co/Se09U5ZHvy
    1 month ago
  • NJDEP aims to simplify permitting process. https://t.co/UTm92DtrAC
    1 month ago
  • U.S. Supreme Court will hear PennEast Pipeline appeal of New Jersey eminent domain dispute. https://t.co/AqqvTw1QD2
    2 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Environmental remediation timeframes extended again in February 2021 due to COVID-19

Throughout the COVID-19 public health emergency, keeping up with deadlines and time frames has been a difficult task for many. The State of New Jersey as well as the New
Read More
Environmental remediation timeframes extended again in February 2021 due to COVID-19

New Jersey Courts Make it Easier for Commercial Landlords to Change the Locks and for Lenders to Foreclose

The COVID pandemic began in March of 2020 and placed many individuals, businesses and mortgage lenders in circumstances which seemingly only ever existed in their wildest dreams. Among those impacted
Read More
New Jersey Courts Make it Easier for Commercial Landlords to Change the Locks and for Lenders to Foreclose

Changes to Phase I Environmental Site Assessment standards may change federal environmental due diligence requirements.

At both the state and federal levels, purchasers of commercial property are required to perform certain environmental investigations in order to shield themselves from liability for contamination found after the
Read More
Changes to Phase I Environmental Site Assessment standards may change federal environmental due diligence requirements.

Appeals Court Critical of Law Firm’s “Scorched Earth” Collected Tactics in Landlord Tenant Case

Law firms hired by landlords in collection actions against tenants can be liable to pay the tenant both statutory penalties and attorneys fees if they use improper collection practices. That’s
Read More
Appeals Court Critical of Law Firm’s “Scorched Earth” Collected Tactics in Landlord Tenant Case

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form