Search Site
Menu
Limiting Liability for Condominium, Homeowner and other Community Associations

On March 20, 2013, the Superior Court of New Jersey ruled in Irma Sanchez v. The Villages Association that the burden of proving the validity of a community association’s bylaws limiting its liability in personal injury cases rests with the injured plaintiff. It is beneficial for community associations, their boards, professional managers and unit owners to be aware of this case and its repercussions. An awareness of these issues could dramatically decrease the instances of lawsuits, and could save community associations and their members a great deal of time and financial burdens.

In Sanchez v. Villages Association, the plaintiff injured herself on a portion of cement sidewalk in disrepair. The plaintiff initially alleged that the association was at fault for the injury, claiming negligence. The association contended that they had instituted “a bylaw that restricts its premises liability in accordance with N.J.S.A. 2A:62A-13 to instances of willful, wanton, or grossly negligent conduct.” The judge ruled that the disrepair constituted standard negligence, rather than the willful, wanton, or gross negligence outlined in N.J.S.A. 2A:62A-14.

The plaintiff then argued that N.J.S.A. 2A:62A-14 had not been properly integrated into the association’s bylaws, which permitted the governing document to be “altered or repealed . . . by an affirmative vote of 51% or greater,” rather than the 2/3 (or 67%) vote required by N.J.S.A. 2A:62A-14. The plaintiff alleged that the presence of Article XII casted doubt on whether the liability protections permitted by N.J.S.A. 2A:62A-14 were properly integrated into the association’s bylaws.

Upon presentation of documents by the defendant, the judge ruled that at face value, the bylaws were adequately implemented. The defense presented a forty-two page document dated July 15, 1998 that was adequately endorsed by the attorney who prepared the papers as well as the association’s president and secretary. In light of the document, the judge ruled that N.J.S.A. 2A:62A-14 certainly appeared to have been properly voted into the association’s bylaws and that plaintiff—whom had been a resident of the association for seventeen years—had been effectively on “constructive notice of the bylaws’ content.”

Sanchez establishes the precedent that the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating inadequate amendment of the bylaws to include a liability limitation. As long a community association is able to establish that it implemented the liability protections of N.J.S.A. 2A:62A-14 by way of a 2/3 vote, the liability protection should stand. If nothing else, Sanchez highlights the essential nature of community association recordkeeping. Community associations, and their professional managers, must keep track of any changes in community bylaws and ensure that the mode of passage is consistent with the governing documents and statutory requirements.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • 44 acres of forest preserved in Byram. https://t.co/Or5pMiHxxE
    4 weeks ago
  • Federal Court Rules Gas Pipeline Company Can Start Taking Land. https://t.co/NSRzQjQYwh
    1 month ago
  • Ridgewood Water prepares to sue corporation over chemical contamination. https://t.co/n3R1PcF1Og
    1 month ago
  • Owners of rural NJ cabins still do not know if they can keep them. https://t.co/tKh1WqjZFS
    2 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Terranova vs. General Electric Pension Trust: Clarifying (or complicating) defenses under the Spill Act

On January 4, 2019, the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down a decision in Terranova vs. General Electric Pension Trust, Docket No. A-5699-16T3 (hereinafter, “Terranova”). In Terranova, The New Jersey
Read More
Terranova vs. General Electric Pension Trust: Clarifying (or complicating) defenses under the Spill Act

A “New Day” in New Jersey Environmental Law and Enforcement: Environmental Justice and Natural Resource Damage Cases Take Flight Under New Administration Watch

By: Michael C. Kondrla, Esq.1 In August, Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal and the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) announced the filing of six lawsuits focused on contaminated properties, three of
Read More
A “New Day” in New Jersey Environmental Law and Enforcement: Environmental Justice and Natural Resource Damage Cases Take Flight Under New Administration Watch

NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

On August 2, 2018, New Jersey’s Supreme Court held that a holder of a municipal tax lien may have standing to challenge a local planning board’s approval for a neighboring
Read More
NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

On August 1, 2018, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division ruled in favor of plaintiff in the matter captioned Joseph S. D’Elia v. Joyce Campisi and Liberty Mutual
Read More
The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form