Search Site
Menu
Changes to NJ Contaminated Site Remediation: May 7, 2012 Deadline Draws Near

When the Site Remediation Reform Act (“Act”) was passed in 2009, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (“NJDEP”) mandatory opt-in date of May 7, 2012 appeared to be very far away. However, with that date fast approaching, some site owners are scrambling to meet compliance with the Act. If you have not been bombarded with letters from the NJDEP or dire warnings from consultants, take note that by May 7, 2012 all contaminated sites that are being overseen by the NJDEP must hire a Licensed Site Remediation Professional (“LSRP”) who will then take over the oversight of that case (with few exceptions).

This change has both benefits and detriments. The major benefit is that you will no longer have to wait for the NJDEP to respond to reports and remedial strategy requests. In fact, the main purpose behind this legislation was to speed up remedial actions after seeing cleanups languish for years due to case backlogs. However, there are negative aspects to the Act. For example, administrative costs will rise as LSRPs will incur costs to file necessary reports with the NJDEP. There are also mandatory timeframes for remedial actions with substantial penalties for missing those deadlines, including losing the right to choose your remedial strategy.

Additionally, there is some concern regarding the role of LSRPs. Previously, responsible parties could rest somewhat assured that their consultants were working as their advocates, ensuring that cleanup strategies would comprise the most cost-effective solutions consistent with the applicable regulatory scheme. However, LSRPs are now licensed by the state, subject to review and audit by the licensing board, and required to report discharges and clients who do not comply with the remedial strategy selected by the LSRP. This could create a conflict for those LSRPs faced with a conflict between client expectations and the LSRP’s own obligations as a licensed professional.

Another aspect of the Act that will come into effect in the fall of 2012 is the Remedial Priority Scoring System. The NJDEP plans to publish – online – a ranking of all contaminated sites in the state using a computer model. These sites will be separated into five categories with Category 1 representing the least potential risk to public health, safety or the environment and Category 5 representing the highest potential risk. The NJDEP is allowing responsible parties an opportunity to appeal both the initial rank and category. The ranking system will be updated every six months for the first year and on a quarterly basis thereafter.

As environmental lawyers with decades of experience assisting clients navigating the hazardous site remediation process at both the state and federal levels, the attorneys at Lieberman & Blecher have been called upon by many clients to help manage the LSRP transition and respond to issues presented by the new affirmative cleanup obligations enshrined in the Act. To ensure compliance with the Act and that their rights are protected, property owners or other potentially responsible parties should contact environmental counsel. Our team can assist with questions about the LSRP program, concerns about the NJDEP’s scoring system and other contaminated site cleanup issues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • Ridgewood Water prepares to sue corporation over chemical contamination. https://t.co/n3R1PcF1Og
    5 days ago
  • Owners of rural NJ cabins still do not know if they can keep them. https://t.co/tKh1WqjZFS
    2 weeks ago
  • NJ could be first state to ban the use of exotic animals in traveling animal acts. https://t.co/LshnqFXvaq
    1 month ago
  • Court faults NJDEP in changes to radon rules. https://t.co/pcytfc5whf
    1 month ago

Recent Blog Posts

NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

On August 2, 2018, New Jersey’s Supreme Court held that a holder of a municipal tax lien may have standing to challenge a local planning board’s approval for a neighboring
Read More
NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

On August 1, 2018, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division ruled in favor of plaintiff in the matter captioned Joseph S. D’Elia v. Joyce Campisi and Liberty Mutual
Read More
The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, et al. 583 U.S. ____ (2018) Decided January 22, 2018 Since the passing of the Clean Water Act in 1972, the definition of “the waters
Read More
United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment concerning the Environment

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, New Jersey voters will be asked to decide on a state constitutional amendment regarding the use of natural resource damages collected by the State in
Read More
New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment  concerning the Environment

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form