- Environmental Law
- Property Development
- Municipal & Government Entity Representation
- Mold Claims Defense For Property Owners
Earlier in January, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sacket v. EPA, a Clean Water Act (“CWA”) enforcement case that concerns whether CWA administrative orders are subject to pre-enforcement judicial review. In the Sacket case, the property owners planned to build a home on a one-half acre parcel of land in Idaho. After they placed fill on a portion of the land before beginning construction, the EPA issued an administrative compliance order alleging that the owners violated the CWA by filling in a wetland without first obtaining a permit. The EPA ordered the owners to remove the fill material, restore the parcel to its original condition, and monitor the fenced-off site for three years, or face potential penalties of up to $37,500 per day.
The property owners sought a hearing with EPA to challenge the wetlands determination, and when EPA refused to grant a hearing, the owners filed a federal court lawsuit seeking an injunction against EPA. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit, finding that the CWA precludes judicial review of compliance orders before EPA initiates an enforcement action in federal court, and that failure to provide such review does not constitute a violation of due process. The ruling was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit on appeal, which relied on similar rulings from other Circuits.
While the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision may not issue for months, questioning by the Justices suggest that the high court could limit the EPA’s authority to issue these types of compliance orders without judicial oversight. Such a result could have a far-reaching impact on the EPA’s enforcement authority in this and other contexts, and could give parties a new avenue to challenge EPA orders.
When Brittany DeBord runs along the Delaware River canal towpath or on the trails of Tyler State Park, she doesn’t just appreciate the natural beauty of the...Read More
Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...Read More
CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...Read More
As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.Read More