By Stuart Lieberman | Published October 21, 2014 | Posted in Development, Land Use, Permitting | Tagged Tags: Appellate Division, Billboard, community organization | Leave a comment
Search Site
10 Jefferson Plaza, Suite 400 | Princeton, New Jersey 08540
845 Third Avenue, 6th Floor | New York, New York 10022
845 Third Avenue, 6th Floor | New York, New York 10022
Call for a consultation
732-355-1311
Tag Archive
Appellate Division
1 - 4 of 4
Page 1 of 1
Appellate Division Affirms Franklin Township Ban on Digital Billboards
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently upheld a decision by Franklin Township, New Jersey to ban digital billboards along a stretch of Interstate 287, while allowing static billboards to be implemented. The Appellate Division determined that no violation of the First Amendment took place as part of the ban, with Judge Marianne Espinosa stating that Read More
Read MoreAppellate Division Limits Scope of Waiver Provision in Gym Membership
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently held that an exculpatory clause within a fitness club’s membership agreement does not operate to absolve the club of all liability for personal injury on its premises. The case, Walters v. YMCA, 2014 N.J. Super. LEXIS 117 (App. Div. Aug. 11, 2014), was brought by a member of the Read More
Read MoreRecent N.J. Court Decisions Examine the Applicability of OPRA
In two recent New Jersey court opinions, important questions as to the scope and application of the New Jersey Open Public Record Act (“OPRA”) were decided. The first, Kennedy v. Montclair Center Corporation Business Improvement District, 2014 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1654 (App. Div. Jun. 24, 2014), clarifies that OPRA applies to corporations formed to Read More
Read MoreNJ Supreme Court Judge Rules Two-Step Process Required for Eminent Domain Zoning Changes
In a recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision entitled Borough of Saddle River v. 66 East Allendale, LLC the Court addressed whether “it was proper to allow the jury to hear evidence on the likelihood of a zoning change without the trial court first determining outside of the jury’s presence that there was a reasonable Read More
Read More
1 - 4 of 4
Page 1 of 1
Our Attorneys
Contact Our Firm
