Search Site
Menu
Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevichs Michael Sinkevich

Friday, March 28, 2008

Zoners again deny shopping center

BY CHRISTOPHER DELA CRUZ
Star-Ledger Staff

Monroe Township board rebuffs developer’s request for variance

The Monroe Township zoning board denied for the second time in three years an effort from a prominent Middlesex developer to build a shopping center at Route 522/ Buckelew Avenue and Schoolhouse Road.

Three years ago, residents in the area voiced concerns about traffic congestion, noise, light pollution, litter and quality of life, and the same concerns were brought up at the town’s packed zoning board meeting on Tuesday. Renaissance Properties was seeking a variance for the land, which is zoned for the construction of single-family homes.

The zoning board said the proposed Marketplace at Monroe violated the town’s master plan, and it failed to show why the plan deserved approval after the previous rejection, said Karl Meyertons, at torney for the zoning board.

“The facts were essentially the same,” said Meyertons. “They were applying for a bank and commercial use in’04, and they were apply ing for a bank and several commercial uses now.”

Robert McDaid, president of Renaissance Properties, said he feels that the area, which is across from a firehouse and a store, is ideal for commercial use. McDaid said he would try other avenues to develop the shopping center, including possibly changing the zoning in the master plan.

“Unfortunately, there are some people that live in the neighborhood that ran around crying, ‘there’s a plague in town,’ me being the plague,” said McDaid. “We will look at our options. We are not going away.”

After the first shopping center proposal failed in 2004, Renaissance Properties applied to build eight residential houses in the area, which the zoning board approved. The developer recently decided to scrap the housing plan in favor of the shopping center.

Six members of the zoning board voted against the shopping center proposal. The sole supporter was Alan Plans, the board chairman.

Residents from the nearby development Devonshire objected to the plan, arguing they paid premiums to live by open space away from commercial development.

“To see the neighbors come out and stick together, it was heartwarming,” said Warren Barnes, a resident on Schoolhouse Road.

But Patrick Hye, a resident on nearby Mount Mills Road, called the decision an “embarrassment” and felt a shopping center would provide jobs and added convenience, while building more houses would add children to school and require more maintenance services.

“The taxpayers would be spending their money to support our town,” said Hye. “It brings in revenue into the town without overburdening the school system. We need more businesses.”

McDaid said there would have been from 600 to 700 feet between Devonshire and the property that would not be developed because of land he gave away as open space to the town.

“I guess they’ve been told the big bad developers are going to cut down all the trees,” said McDaid. “That will always remain open space.”

Christopher Dela Cruz may be reached at (732) 404-8091 or [email protected].

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    2 months ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    2 months ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    3 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    4 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form