Search Site
Menu
Lieberman & Blechers Michael Sinkevich

Friday, March 28, 2008

Zoners again deny shopping center

BY CHRISTOPHER DELA CRUZ
Star-Ledger Staff

Monroe Township board rebuffs developer’s request for variance

The Monroe Township zoning board denied for the second time in three years an effort from a prominent Middlesex developer to build a shopping center at Route 522/ Buckelew Avenue and Schoolhouse Road.

Three years ago, residents in the area voiced concerns about traffic congestion, noise, light pollution, litter and quality of life, and the same concerns were brought up at the town’s packed zoning board meeting on Tuesday. Renaissance Properties was seeking a variance for the land, which is zoned for the construction of single-family homes.

The zoning board said the proposed Marketplace at Monroe violated the town’s master plan, and it failed to show why the plan deserved approval after the previous rejection, said Karl Meyertons, at torney for the zoning board.

“The facts were essentially the same,” said Meyertons. “They were applying for a bank and commercial use in’04, and they were apply ing for a bank and several commercial uses now.”

Robert McDaid, president of Renaissance Properties, said he feels that the area, which is across from a firehouse and a store, is ideal for commercial use. McDaid said he would try other avenues to develop the shopping center, including possibly changing the zoning in the master plan.

“Unfortunately, there are some people that live in the neighborhood that ran around crying, ‘there’s a plague in town,’ me being the plague,” said McDaid. “We will look at our options. We are not going away.”

After the first shopping center proposal failed in 2004, Renaissance Properties applied to build eight residential houses in the area, which the zoning board approved. The developer recently decided to scrap the housing plan in favor of the shopping center.

Six members of the zoning board voted against the shopping center proposal. The sole supporter was Alan Plans, the board chairman.

Residents from the nearby development Devonshire objected to the plan, arguing they paid premiums to live by open space away from commercial development.

“To see the neighbors come out and stick together, it was heartwarming,” said Warren Barnes, a resident on Schoolhouse Road.

But Patrick Hye, a resident on nearby Mount Mills Road, called the decision an “embarrassment” and felt a shopping center would provide jobs and added convenience, while building more houses would add children to school and require more maintenance services.

“The taxpayers would be spending their money to support our town,” said Hye. “It brings in revenue into the town without overburdening the school system. We need more businesses.”

McDaid said there would have been from 600 to 700 feet between Devonshire and the property that would not be developed because of land he gave away as open space to the town.

“I guess they’ve been told the big bad developers are going to cut down all the trees,” said McDaid. “That will always remain open space.”

Christopher Dela Cruz may be reached at (732) 404-8091 or [email protected].

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • State's Tidal Wetlands Could be Swamped by Rising Seas. https://t.co/hoCylgBVyN
    2 weeks ago
  • Scientist finds rare plant last seen in NJ 100 years ago. https://t.co/03jJRVd3cc
    4 weeks ago
  • NJ is the first state to regulate PFNAs in drinking water. https://t.co/huLEDnc444
    4 weeks ago
  • Nation's oldest nuclear power plant to shut down permanently Monday. https://t.co/LHSjcNvZVW
    4 weeks ago

Recent Blog Posts

NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

On August 2, 2018, New Jersey’s Supreme Court held that a holder of a municipal tax lien may have standing to challenge a local planning board’s approval for a neighboring
Read More
NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

On August 1, 2018, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division ruled in favor of plaintiff in the matter captioned Joseph S. D’Elia v. Joyce Campisi and Liberty Mutual
Read More
The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, et al. 583 U.S. ____ (2018) Decided January 22, 2018 Since the passing of the Clean Water Act in 1972, the definition of “the waters
Read More
United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment concerning the Environment

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, New Jersey voters will be asked to decide on a state constitutional amendment regarding the use of natural resource damages collected by the State in
Read More
New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment  concerning the Environment

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form