Search Site
Menu
Sea Bright-Highlands Bridge Construction

March 15, 2008

Bridge time line warrants probe

Asbury Park Press

Despite a rash of lawsuits, the state Department of Transportation is moving full speed ahead on the Route 36 Sea Bright-Highlands bridge project. Plans to replace the drawbridge with a fixed span almost twice its height has drawn the justifiable ire of residents in both boroughs.

Because of what Stuart Lieberman, attorney for the opposition group Citizens for Rational Coastal Development, charitably called “a sharp discrepancy” in the bridge work time line, Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., and state Sen. Sean Kean, R-Monmouth, should take the lead in demanding an investigation by the state Attorney General’s office. And U.S. District Court Judge Joel Pisano should expedite Lieberman’s request to elicit further information from the DOT and halt all construction and related activities until the matter is resolved.

DOT officials have been caught time and again making statements relating to the project that strain credulity. The agency’s credibility won’t be helped by its rush to clear land by the bridge just weeks after it claimed in court that work would not begin for at least a year.

The citizens group sought an injunction in federal court barring work on the bridge until pending legal matters had been resolved. At the Feb. 4 hearing, Pisano, sitting in Trenton, denied the request, based in part on the DOT’s representation the bridge would not be touched until May 19, 2009. The contractors started clearing the approach to the span Feb. 11. Lieberman wrote to Pisano citing the “significant and peculiar” fact that, just two weeks after the DOT cited the 2009 date, it claimed there was a “misunderstanding” and work on the approach would start in the near future.

The DOT responded by blaming the contractor for proceeding with a “different and extremely aggressive construction schedule” — one the DOT approved. But it has failed to say exactly when. Lieberman contends the DOT should have told the court about the change if it was made before the Feb. 4 hearing or before Feb. 21, when the judge filed his written opinion.

Lieberman noted that staging work on a project of such magnitude likely would not have been “devised within the last 30 days” and called it “almost inconceivable” the DOT was unable to correctly answer the question raised by the court: When will the historic bridge be affected by construction activity? Because the time line was a major factor in Pisano’s decision, Lieberman said he will seek probes by the U.S. and state attorneys general if the DOT fails to divulge who knew about the schedule change and when they knew it.

The project has taken on the foul odor of similar government construction projects, railroaded through the system with utter disregard for the wishes, quality of life or property values of affected taxpayers. Further work on the bridge should be halted until questions relating to the time line are answered and the pending litigation has run its course.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • 44 acres of forest preserved in Byram. https://t.co/Or5pMiHxxE
    4 weeks ago
  • Federal Court Rules Gas Pipeline Company Can Start Taking Land. https://t.co/NSRzQjQYwh
    1 month ago
  • Ridgewood Water prepares to sue corporation over chemical contamination. https://t.co/n3R1PcF1Og
    1 month ago
  • Owners of rural NJ cabins still do not know if they can keep them. https://t.co/tKh1WqjZFS
    2 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Terranova vs. General Electric Pension Trust: Clarifying (or complicating) defenses under the Spill Act

On January 4, 2019, the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down a decision in Terranova vs. General Electric Pension Trust, Docket No. A-5699-16T3 (hereinafter, “Terranova”). In Terranova, The New Jersey
Read More
Terranova vs. General Electric Pension Trust: Clarifying (or complicating) defenses under the Spill Act

A “New Day” in New Jersey Environmental Law and Enforcement: Environmental Justice and Natural Resource Damage Cases Take Flight Under New Administration Watch

By: Michael C. Kondrla, Esq.1 In August, Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal and the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) announced the filing of six lawsuits focused on contaminated properties, three of
Read More
A “New Day” in New Jersey Environmental Law and Enforcement: Environmental Justice and Natural Resource Damage Cases Take Flight Under New Administration Watch

NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

On August 2, 2018, New Jersey’s Supreme Court held that a holder of a municipal tax lien may have standing to challenge a local planning board’s approval for a neighboring
Read More
NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

On August 1, 2018, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division ruled in favor of plaintiff in the matter captioned Joseph S. D’Elia v. Joyce Campisi and Liberty Mutual
Read More
The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form