Search Site
Menu
Princeton-Based Law Firm Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich Topple Cell Tower Proposals

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Cell tower proposal toppled

By JENNIFER H. CUNNINGHAM
HERALD NEWS

LITTLE FALLS — The Planning Board rejected a cell phone company’s plan to build a cell tower in the Great Notch Fire Company’s parking lot.

Board member Walter Kilpatrick introduced the motion to deny Omnipoint Communications’ application at Tuesday night’s special Planning Board meeting at Passaic Valley Regional High School.

Kilpatrick said the proposed 10,000-square-foot property is not big enough to accommodate the cell tower, and added that the cell phone company would need several variances.

“I believe that this site will be overwhelmed by this,” Kilpatrick said at the meeting. “It provides a possible safety issue. Substantial variances would have to be changed and we are unwilling to do that.”

But Joseph O’Neill, a lawyer representing Omnipoint at the meeting, said building the cell tower would close a gap in coverage, while enhancing municipal first responders’ communication capabilities.

“We’re improving the communications of (first responders),” O’Neill told the board. “Omnipoint is satisfying needs with the Fire Department, satisfying the needs of police and satisfying the needs of EMS.”

Firefighters from the Great Notch Volunteer Fire Company said they were counting on using the revenue from the cell tower to offset their operating expenses. Firefighter Ray Klepar said the department would have to look at other ways to fund the company — which may cut into firefighting.

“We have a need,” Klepar said. “We gotta do what we gotta do.”

Similar cell tower proposals have been turned down in Mahwah and Lincoln Park, according to local newspaper reports. But cell phone companies have won several appeals, overturning decisions in Leonia, Fair Lawn and Kinnelon.

Residents on both sides of the debate voiced their opinions to the board.

Ronald Gollhardt, who lives less than 400 yards from an existing cell tower on Sigtim Drive, said he hardly notices it and has not seen any health problems in himself, his wife or his cat.

“Some neighbors didn’t even know it was there,” he said. “I heard there is more danger in microwave ovens than in cell towers.”

But another resident, Michael Glita, said property values would decrease if more cell towers were erected.

“I’m afraid of what impression people will get when they come into town and see that tower,” he said.

Reach Jennifer H. Cunningham at 973-569-7162 or [email protected]

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    1 month ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    1 month ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    2 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    3 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form