Search Site
Menu
Lieberman & Blecher is successful in a much disputed beach access case

May 21, 2004

Ruling expands access to beaches

By RICHARD DEGENER
Staff Writer, (609) 463-6711

LOWER TOWNSHIP – An appellate court, in a decision hailed by the state as a major victory for public beach access, ruled Thursday that a group of Diamond Beach homeowners have the right to cross the sands of a private beach club.

The judges’ ruling also put the state Department of Environmental Protection in charge of determining the club’s beach-tag prices.

Previous rulings gave the Raleigh Avenue Beach Association access rights to cross the dry sand to get to the wet sand at a strand owned by the Atlantis Beach Club. A lower court ruling even gave the Raleigh Avenue residents a 3-foot strip of dry sand above the wet sand.

The unanimous ruling by three Superior Court Appellate Division judges Thursday gives the homeowners access rights to all the dry sand at the Atlantis Beach Club, meaning they can walk anywhere on the privately owned beach.

“The public shall enjoy the right to use all of the dry sand and complete horizontal access to the subject property, including the ocean,” the ruling states.

The DEP, which filed a motion in the case after it was sued by both sides, called it a major victory for the public.

DEP Commissioner Bradley Campbell said the ruling supports the Public Trust Doctrine, a law that dates to ancient times and guarantees the public access to certain lands.

“It’s a significant victory for pubic access to our beaches and the Public Trust Doctrine. We’re pleased the courts allowed greater access than previously. I think the court recognized, to be meaningful, public access has to mean more than a 3-foot path to the water,” Campbell said.

The decision was even more than one Raleigh Avenue homeowner hoped for. Carmen Axmann joined about 200 other people in the association to win reasonable beach fees.

Atlantis Beach Club was charging families $700 per summer to use the beach, or selling them lifetime easements for $10,000, prices, which have gone up this year to $900 and $15,000. A single beach tag for one person sells for $300.

“I think it’s a huge win for us and the state. This affects all other private beaches. This will set a precedent all over the coast,” Axmann said.

The ruling does not allow the public to use the beach for extended periods of time; it allows only access to other areas. But in a decision much more important to homeowners like Axmann, the judges put the DEP in charge of deciding the beach-tag prices.

The ruling gives the agency until June 10 and says the tags must include daily, weekly, monthly and seasonal prices.

While most shore towns charge $20 or less for seasonal tags, Diamond Beach homeowners have said they would accept something higher, but it should not be hundreds or thousands of dollars. Campbell said the DEP would look for fees “that are commensurate with the costs.”

The ruling addresses fees: “The amount charged shall be reasonable and comparable to other beach-tag charges in the region, recognizing that (Atlantis Beach Club) is a private corporation; the fees established shall reflect an amount sufficient to cover costs of operation, which may include a reasonable amount for administrative services,” the ruling states.

Atlantis Beach Club must provide showers, lifeguards and beach cleaning if it is going to charge fees, the judges ruled.

The ruling was termed an “interim order” pending the filing of a formal full opinion, but Campbell said he expects no major changes in the final order. The record is important since the case could end up being heard by the state Supreme Court.

Attorneys for Atlantis Beach Club could not be reached for comment Thursday. They considered September’s lower court ruling by Superior Court Judge Steven Perskie a partial victory. It did not allow full access to the dry sand and did not require daily beach tags, something the Raleigh Avenue residents have been fighting for.

Stuart Lieberman, attorney for the Raleigh Avenue Beach Association, called the ruling “a major affirmation of the Public Trust Doctrine.”

“It’s full beach access. Judge Perskie gave us 3 feet,” Lieberman said.

The Public Trust Doctrine is apparently still being defined as it pertains to modern times at the New Jersey shore. The doctrine began with Roman Emperor Justinian almost 15 centuries ago.

The “Institutes of Justinian” guaranteed people the right to the seashore and other public areas. The doctrine was strengthened in 1215 in England with the signing of the Magna Carta. It came to New Jersey in the 17th century when King George II granted charters for East Jersey and West Jersey to loyal court allies John Berkeley and George Cateret.

While more concerned about navigation, fishing and hunting rights in the past, the old doctrine has been used by environmental groups to push beach-access issues.

The Sierra Club was one of the groups that filed briefs in this case. Tim Dillingham, of the Sierra Club, called Thursday’s ruling “very big” in defining how the doctrine relates to beaches.

“The question is, where does the Public Trust Doctrine allow the public on beaches? Perskie said only 3 feet above the high water. This gives the public all the dry sand and the ocean,” Dillingham said.

To e-mail Richard Degener at The Press:

[email protected]

Copyright 2004 © The Atlantic City Press

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • Newark and Camden receive $400K each to clean up contaminated sites. https://t.co/x3V6AZHkOb
    3 days ago
  • Murphy Administration rejects golf course expansion onto Liberty State Park. https://t.co/cy8lGbz1uJ
    1 week ago
  • Preservationists score big win in fight to protect Princeton Battlefield. https://t.co/80vdiYX0GQ
    2 weeks ago
  • Glass recycling plant breaks ground on former quarry land in Sussex County. https://t.co/puNFMPIaOe
    2 weeks ago

Recent Blog Posts

United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, et al. 583 U.S. ____ (2018) Decided January 22, 2018 Since the passing of the Clean Water Act in 1972, the definition of “the waters
Read More
United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment concerning the Environment

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, New Jersey voters will be asked to decide on a state constitutional amendment regarding the use of natural resource damages collected by the State in
Read More
New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment  concerning the Environment

Appellate Division Case Demonstrates Importance of Carefully Negotiated Escrow Agreements

Real estate transactions involving commercial and residential properties frequently employ the use of escrow agreements to address potential environmental issues.  This practice is widespread in New Jersey and it permits
Read More
Appellate Division Case Demonstrates Importance of Carefully Negotiated Escrow Agreements

NJDEP Updates Soil Remediation Standards for 19 Contaminants

Effective September 18, 2017, new soil remediation standards govern the cleanup of contaminated sites in New Jersey.  The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) recently updated remedial standards for
Read More
NJDEP Updates Soil Remediation Standards for 19 Contaminants

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form