Search Site
Menu
New Jersey Superfund

New Jersey Superfund Sites

While we often hear the buzzword, Superfund site, we may not know what it means. Superfund is the nickname for the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). This federal law calls for identifying the most contaminated sites in the U.S. and pushing responsible parties to clean them up.

Superfund often receives federal funding, including $9.3 billion in 1986, and $600 million as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, of which, $160 million were earmarked for New Jersey Superfund cleanup of eight sites.

Congress enacted Superfund in 1980 in response to Love Canal in New York, the Valley of the Drums in Kentucky, and other contamination disasters. Before being added as to the Superfund list, a risk assessment is performed on the site and neighboring site to determine environmental impact. As of May 14, 2010, the Superfund National Priority List (NPL), which lists the most threatening Superfund sites in the U.S., totaled 1,279 sites. While many are listed as completed or deleted, new ones are continually added.

About New Jersey Superfund law and enforcement

The following sites are targeted for Superfund cleanup in New Jersey:

  • Mattel and Stauffer Chemical in Edison
  • Sherwin-Williams and Newark Disposal in Newark
  • U.S. Steel, American Standard, and Congoleum in Trenton
  • Campbell Soup and Monsanto in Camden
  • Roebling Steel in Florence
  • Imperial Oil in Marlboro
  • Vineland Chemical in Vineland

Superfund sites are managed by the U.S. Department of Environmental Protection and require immediate cleanup because they pose significant threats to the public and environment. However, state and local programs manage Brownfield sites.

There is also a new initiative by the NJ Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) called The Natural Resource Damage Program which evaluates existing cleanup cases, identifies responsible parties, and pushes them to repair and restore the natural resources they damaged.

Whether it is a Superfund, Brownfield, or NRD site, the crux of the problem often boils down to money. New Jersey Superfund liability can require millions of dollars to clean up a single site. Superfund litigation in New Jersey may be needed to enforce compliance.

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection oversees the New Jersey Superfund program and New Jersey Superfund risk assessment. Toxic substances commonly removed from contaminated Superfund sites include the following:

  • Arsenic
  • Benzene
  • Cadmium
  • Choroform
  • Copper
  • Cyanide
  • Lead
  • Mercury
  • Methylene choride
  • Nickel
  • Polychorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
  • Silver
  • Vinyl chloride
  • Zinc

Consult us about New Jersey Superfund litigation

At the law firm of Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich P.C., our environmental lawyers have a thorough understanding of Superfund law in New Jersey and can provide guidance on how to deal with the law if you are responsible for a site’s clean up or are pursuing action against a company or group responsible for a Superfund site. We represent and provide legal guidance to individuals, businesses and municipalities in state and federal courts in all types of environmental matters including the NJ wetlands, Pinelands, and environmental contamination.

Our website details our extensive track record fighting and winning toxic contamination lawsuits. To protect your rights and discuss your case, call us today at (732) 355-1311 or contact us online.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    1 month ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    1 month ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    2 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    3 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form