Search Site
Menu
Residents oppose plan for two cellular towers

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Residents oppose plan for two cellular towers

BY ALEX ZDAN
Foes object to process for designating public land

The site, which does not need formal approval by the planning or zoning boards as the area is already zoned for cell tower use, was discussed at the planning board meeting Monday night.

“This is a somewhat unusual matter for the planning board in that it’s what you would call an informal review,” board chairman Tom Wilfrid said.

The board will make a recommendation to the township council, which will then decide whether to go ahead with the application of Cellco, better known as Verizon Wireless.

“One of the important questions the planning board is responsible for looking at is the appropriateness of the site,” Wilfrid added. “So this is the first step in what is envisioned at this point as a three-hearing process.”

But that very process was part of the objections raised by attorney Stuart Lieberman, who was representing nearby residents in their bid to block the cell tower plan.

“If you were just doing this for something like a municipal pool, I could understand,” Lieberman said, “but when you’re doing it for Verizon, it’s my position you need site approval.”

Taking township land acquired from a private owner for one purpose and handing it over to another private owner for a different purpose merits using the formal process, Lieberman argued. The land was acquired by the township from Bristol-Myers Squibb in 1992 and planned to be used for a fire or emergency substation.

“This was supposed to be a firehouse,” Lieberman said.

He also cited as a conflict of interest the probability the township would be paid for use of the land and that the company would not charge the township for use of the cell tower.

“Usually as an inducement, all companies will give you a free ride,” he said.

This would not have been the case if, as originally planned, the cell tower had gone on the property of Peterson’s Nursery on Lawrenceville Road.

In a unanimous decision in December, the zoning board decided to deny a change in zoning to construct the tower there. The day before the special zoning board meeting discussing the Cellco application, the township council voted to recommend the tower site be moved to Carter Road.

The recommendation was sent to the zoning board in the form of a letter from Township Manager Richard Krawczun, which was read into the record at the Dec. 19 meeting by special zoning board attorney David Roskos.

Police Capt. Mark Boyd said placing an antenna on the Carter Road tower would be a “golden opportunity” for the police to seal gaps in their radio coverage.

Before its application, Cellco had identified locations that would address gaps in cell phone service, then approached the owners of those properties. Peterson’s Nursery was the only place to say yes.

The third hearing will be necessary as the township’s radio frequency expert Christine Malone was called out of state on business and was unable to attend Monday’s meeting.

Contact Alex Zdan at [email protected] or (609) 989-5702.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    1 month ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    1 month ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    2 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    3 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form