Search Site
Menu
Opposing Cell Towers and Cell Antennas

November 13, 2005

OPPOSING CELL TOWERS AND CELL ANTENNAS

The Daily Sentinel
Environmentally Speaking

Communities everywhere are the target of proposed cell towers and cell antennas. The equation is simple: the more people who use cell phones, the more antennas have to be erected.

Affluent neighborhoods are most at risk. That’s because they are more likely to use more cell phones, which means they are more likely to require new antennas.

Cell companies understand that no one wants these ugly eyesores in their own neighborhoods. For years, they picked the easier locations. They favored non residential areas, industrial areas where possible. Even today, cell companies try to avoid residential areas because they do not want the fights that inevitably occur if they try to go there.

The problem is that in many places, the non offending locations have already been chosen and are in use. Which means that many US communities are now being asked to host cell antennas in the middle of residential neighborhoods.

What you need to know if a cell company is targeting your neighborhood:

Federal law preempts some state laws regarding placement of cell towers. But, local land use law still applies. Neighbors should not be misled into believing that they cannot win a cell tower location fight.

Every municipality must allow cell towers somewhere. Make sure that your municipality has a smart zoning ordinance that allows cell towers in only suitable locations.

Cell companies argue that these towers are not dangerous. But many studies are not conclusive. You need to decide whether you trust studies on this issue.

Many municipalities secretly wan to install towers on municipal buildings because they can make a lot of revenue. Make sure that these deals are in the open, and that community members are given a chance to comment.

Cell companies are entitled to good coverage, not perfect coverage. Sometimes a more suitable and appropriate location may provide slightly less coverage, but nonetheless adequate coverage.

These cell companies come, install their towers, and leave. They really do not care about your community or the effect installation will have on it.

Often cell companies must prove need before a new tower location can be approved. Take a close look at how this is being done. Is the data reliable and can it be replicated? Is this just a product of computer modeling, or are people complaining of dropped calls as well.

This is not an easy business. Cell companies rely on seasoned professionals to win local approvals. This means that communities seeking to oppose towers must also retain good lawyers and good experts. You cannot win without the best talent available.

Communities that oppose a tower placement must unite and work together. While few people can afford to foot the bill alone several families working together can often foot the bill and win.

Copyright 2005 The Daily Sentinel

November 13, 2005

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • State's Tidal Wetlands Could be Swamped by Rising Seas. https://t.co/hoCylgBVyN
    3 weeks ago
  • Scientist finds rare plant last seen in NJ 100 years ago. https://t.co/03jJRVd3cc
    1 month ago
  • NJ is the first state to regulate PFNAs in drinking water. https://t.co/huLEDnc444
    1 month ago
  • Nation's oldest nuclear power plant to shut down permanently Monday. https://t.co/LHSjcNvZVW
    1 month ago

Recent Blog Posts

NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

On August 2, 2018, New Jersey’s Supreme Court held that a holder of a municipal tax lien may have standing to challenge a local planning board’s approval for a neighboring
Read More
NJ Supreme Court Sees Standing in Tax Lienholders to Challenge Municipal Approval

The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

On August 1, 2018, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division ruled in favor of plaintiff in the matter captioned Joseph S. D’Elia v. Joyce Campisi and Liberty Mutual
Read More
The Downside to Higher Ground: Appellate Division affirms finding of a townhome owner’s negligence and responsibility for water damage to a below unit caused by a prolonged leaking washing machine hose

United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, et al. 583 U.S. ____ (2018) Decided January 22, 2018 Since the passing of the Clean Water Act in 1972, the definition of “the waters
Read More
United States Supreme Court Tackles Key Clean Water Act Judicial Review Issue

New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment concerning the Environment

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, New Jersey voters will be asked to decide on a state constitutional amendment regarding the use of natural resource damages collected by the State in
Read More
New Jersey Voters to Decide Important State Constitutional Amendment  concerning the Environment

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form