Search Site
Menu
Opposing Cell Towers and Cell Antennas

November 13, 2005

OPPOSING CELL TOWERS AND CELL ANTENNAS

The Daily Sentinel
Environmentally Speaking

Communities everywhere are the target of proposed cell towers and cell antennas. The equation is simple: the more people who use cell phones, the more antennas have to be erected.

Affluent neighborhoods are most at risk. That’s because they are more likely to use more cell phones, which means they are more likely to require new antennas.

Cell companies understand that no one wants these ugly eyesores in their own neighborhoods. For years, they picked the easier locations. They favored non residential areas, industrial areas where possible. Even today, cell companies try to avoid residential areas because they do not want the fights that inevitably occur if they try to go there.

The problem is that in many places, the non offending locations have already been chosen and are in use. Which means that many US communities are now being asked to host cell antennas in the middle of residential neighborhoods.

What you need to know if a cell company is targeting your neighborhood:

Federal law preempts some state laws regarding placement of cell towers. But, local land use law still applies. Neighbors should not be misled into believing that they cannot win a cell tower location fight.

Every municipality must allow cell towers somewhere. Make sure that your municipality has a smart zoning ordinance that allows cell towers in only suitable locations.

Cell companies argue that these towers are not dangerous. But many studies are not conclusive. You need to decide whether you trust studies on this issue.

Many municipalities secretly wan to install towers on municipal buildings because they can make a lot of revenue. Make sure that these deals are in the open, and that community members are given a chance to comment.

Cell companies are entitled to good coverage, not perfect coverage. Sometimes a more suitable and appropriate location may provide slightly less coverage, but nonetheless adequate coverage.

These cell companies come, install their towers, and leave. They really do not care about your community or the effect installation will have on it.

Often cell companies must prove need before a new tower location can be approved. Take a close look at how this is being done. Is the data reliable and can it be replicated? Is this just a product of computer modeling, or are people complaining of dropped calls as well.

This is not an easy business. Cell companies rely on seasoned professionals to win local approvals. This means that communities seeking to oppose towers must also retain good lawyers and good experts. You cannot win without the best talent available.

Communities that oppose a tower placement must unite and work together. While few people can afford to foot the bill alone several families working together can often foot the bill and win.

Copyright 2005 The Daily Sentinel

November 13, 2005

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey sets emergency water standards for new chemicals. https://t.co/trgaaLL1mD
    10 months ago
  • How will New Jersey manage stormwater as the climate changes and flooding increases? https://t.co/dhVLALyzZ2
    10 months ago
  • Unprecedented storms are slamming NJ – learn how to be the best advocate for your clients when the next flood hits.… https://t.co/TicH6iAjP0
    10 months ago
  • Trenton Water Works has removed 25 percent of lead pipes throughout its service area. https://t.co/KUvhMsJlvU
    11 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Condo Liability In Snow Storms

by: Noah Botwinick The Superior Court of New Jersey’s Appellate Division recently overturned a grant of summary judgement to a defendant community association sued by a pedestrian who slipped on ice in a condominium
Read More
Condo Liability In Snow Storms

Lieberman Blecher and Sinkevich Announces New Partner and New Associate

Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich, PC is proud to announce the naming of Ms. Brittany W. DeBord, Esq. as a shareholder. Brittany joined the firm as an associate attorney in 2016,
Read More
Lieberman Blecher and Sinkevich Announces New Partner and New Associate

Village of Ridgefield Park v. Outfront Media, LLC and Planning/Zoning Board of the Borough of Bogota

The Superior Court of New Jersey’s Appellate Division recently upheld a board decision to approve the settlement of an application for a conditional use variance and final site plan approval
Read More
Village of Ridgefield Park v. Outfront Media, LLC and Planning/Zoning Board of the Borough of Bogota

PCBs and other chemicals found in Colonia high school

How is it that PCBs and other cancer causing compounds have been found in Colonia High School? Where is the outrage? Where is the speedy competent response? A mother of a
Read More
PCBs and other chemicals found in Colonia high school

In The Media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form