Search Site
Menu
FH Sets Cell Tower Height Demo

FH Sets Cell Tower Height Demo

By Shanna Williams

FAIR HAVEN – The zoning board has not made a final decision on an application by Verizon Wireless and Omni Point Communication, Inc. to construct a 125-foot cell tower at the Church of Nativity, 180 Ridge Road, but residents will have a chance to see exactly how high 125 feet is on July 22.

On that day, representatives for the cell tower applicant will position a crane at the 125 foot level to demonstrate the visual impact the cell tower would have.

The July 13 meeting was the first hearing for application by Verizon to build a cell tower on the church’s property following a series of delays. The zoning board attorney, John Colannino explained that only four members of the zoning board did not have a conflict of interest in hearing the application. Peter Maher, chairman of the zoning board; Marianne Ficarra and Sonia Reevey, both members of the board, heard the case. Suzanne Gottuso, also a member of the zoning board, is eligible to hear the case, but was not present for the meeting. She will review the transcripts of the meeting and be prepared to vote on the application. John Christie, a member of the planning board, was appointed to sit on the zoning board for the Verizon application so the application could be heard by five members. “The statute provides that, in this situation, the most senior member, class four member of the planning board, is to be, shall I say, drafted to sit as a member of the board of adjustment,” Colannino said.

Stuart Lieberman, who was hired by the borough council to represent the municipality at the zoning board application, asked before the hearing began that the testimony be delayed because copies of an expert report used by the applicant was not made available to the public before the hearing. The board decided that the application would proceed, but that the expert witness for the applicant would have to return for the next meeting to be cross- examined by Lieberman and the other attorneys representing residents.

Colannino explained that because the mayor and council decided to hire representation at the zoning board hearings, they would not be able to hear appeals by residents on the final decision made by the board. “In the event that the board approves the use variance that’s being applied for, the statue and the local ordinance Fair Haven ordinance provides that any interested person may appeal that approval to the governing body, mayor and council, of Fair Haven,” he said. However, because the council hired Lieberman, they could not act as an appellate body.

“I think it’s premature to address that,” Lieberman responded.

Warren Stillwell, attorney for the applicant, proposed to the members of the zoning board who heard the application that the applicant bring in a crane and set it up at the church to the proposed height of the cell tower. This way, residents will get an idea of how high the proposed tree-monopole cell tower will be. “What we do is we raise a crane to the height of the proposed tower and then people can drive around and see, visually, what the impact would be,” Stillwell said.

David Padnes, a resident and attorney representing himself and his wife, said because it is the summertime, many residents are on vacation and would not be able to see the crane. “The visual impact should be available for as many residents as possible,” he said.

The crane will be set up on July 22 beginning at 9 a.m. and is expected to be in place for about six hours. Stillwell said if the board finds it necessary, the crane could be set up on another date as well.

Daniel Collins, health and safety expert witness for the applicant, testified that the proposed cell tower meets all federal safety regulations.

Stuart Jacobs, a Fair Haven resident, asked if Collins lives near a cell tower.

Collins responded that he has a cell tower about 200 feet away from his home.

Peter Longo, professional engineer and expert for the applicant, talked about the tower itself and the accessory structures proposed. He said the entire cell tower site, a 60 foot by 60 foot area, would be surrounded by a six foot fence for safety purposes. In addition to the tower, an equipment shelter and a concrete slab, would be in the area.

A radio frequency engineer and a professional planner are scheduled to testify on behalf of the applicant. The hearings will continue at a special meeting on July 27 at 7 p.m.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    4 weeks ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    4 weeks ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    2 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    3 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form