Search Site
Menu
Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich serves as New Jersey counsel in a class action

Wednesday,  April 19, 2006

Lawsuit alleges DuPont contamination of New Jersey drinking water

By RANDALL CHASE
Associated Press Writer

PENNSVILLE TWP. — Drinking water supplies near the DuPont Chambers Works here have been contaminated with chemicals, including a suspected carcinogen used in the production of Teflon, according to a federal lawsuit filed this week.

The lawsuit alleges that the contamination is linked to the manufacturing, use and disposal of perfluorinated chemicals, including perfluorooctanoic acid also known as PFOA, at DuPont.
The plaintiffs are seeking class-action status and compensatory and punitive damages for what they describe as the “intentional, knowing, reckless and negligent acts and omissions of DuPont in connection with the contamination of human drinking water supplies.”

“We’re looking for medical monitoring on behalf of all the people who have been exposed,” added Shari Blecher, an attorney for the plaintiffs.

DuPont released a statement saying the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in New Jersey, is without merit.

“We are confident in the safety of our operations at our Chambers Works site,” the company said.

PFOA, or perfluorooctanoic acid, is a processing aid used in the manufacturing of fluoropolymers, which have a wide variety of product applications, including nonstick cookware. The chemical also can be a byproduct in the manufacturing of fluorotelomers used in surface protection products for applications such as stain-resistant textiles and grease-resistant food wrapping.

According to the lawsuit, DuPont has known for years that PFOA was being released into the air from operations and activities at the Chambers Works Plant, and was contaminating the groundwater underneath.

Similar concentrations have been found in recent testing of water wells owned by the Penn’s Grove Water Supply Co., which supplies public drinking water to the towns of Penns Grove and Carneys Point, the lawsuit claims.

“The levels alleged in the complaint fall well below any established regulatory guidance,” DuPont said in its statement.

“Moreover, to date, there are no known human health effects associated with PFOA. Based on health and toxicological studies conducted by DuPont and other researchers, DuPont believes the weight of evidence indicates that PFOA exposure does not pose a health risk to the general public.”

Tests by Pennsville Township have also shown very slight traces of PFOA in a well there.
In 2004, DuPont agreed to pay as much as $343 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by Ohio and West Virginia residents who alleged that their water supplies had been contaminated with PFOA from a DuPont plant in Parkersburg, W. Va.

The company agreed to spend up to $70 million for medical evaluations of up to 80,000 people who drank water contaminated with the chemical. DuPont also agreed to provide six local utilities with new water treatment equipment and fund an independent study to determine if PFOA makes people sick. Eventually, DuPont could be forced to spend another $235 million on a program to monitor the health of residents exposed to the chemical.

The plaintiffs in the New Jersey lawsuit claim DuPont has failed to undertake similar efforts to protect New Jersey residents.

In addition to contaminated water supplies, the lawsuit alleges that DuPont found elevated levels of organic fluorine in the blood of Chambers Works employees exposed to perfluorinated chemicals in the 1970s, and that the workers had higher incidences of medical disorders, including abnormal liver function tests, when compared with non-exposed workers. The company stopped its blood monitoring program without informing workers of its findings, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit also alleges that DuPont rejected the recommendation of its own occupational health official for a comprehensive medical surveillance program for workers exposed to PFCs, noting that creation of such a program “could have significant repercussions at any of our other sites that handle … similar products.”

DuPont has been working with the EPA to virtually eliminate exposure of PFOA from their manufacturing operations and products since 1989.

John Strait, the plant manager of the DuPont Chamber Works, commented on PFOA when it was first discovered in the water supply in Penns Grove.

“Because it is biopersistent, we want to reduce its emissions,” Strait said
DuPont has reduced its PFOA emissions by 95 percent in 2000 from U.S. manufacturing facilities and hope to eliminate 98 percent worldwide by 2007.

Staff Writer Andrew Frankum contributed to this story.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    4 weeks ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    4 weeks ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    2 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    3 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form