Search Site
Menu
We are hired to stop inappropiate coastal dredging project

04/6/07

Environmentalists attempt to stop plan to store dredge spoils on valuable wetlands

By HARTRIONO B. SASTROWARDOYO
MANAHAWKIN BUREAU

Work on creek set for September

EAGLESWOOD – A Princeton law firm has been retained by a local environmental group opposed to a state plan to store dredge spoils from Westecunk Creek on land adjacent to the Edwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge.

“What they (the state) want to do is completely fill that wetlands with 12 feet of sludge in the most valuable piece of real estate, right on the bay,” Stuart J. Lieberman said Thursday.

Lieberman, of Lieberman and Blecher, is the spokesman for the Edwin B. Forsythe Wildlife Refuge Residents Association. The group is “completely” in support of the dredging project, but against using nearly 26 acres toward the bay end of Dock Road as a place to store dredge spoils, material removed from the bottom of the creek, he said.

Lieberman did not give a total for the number of members in the association but said that it was composed of people who live in the vicinity of the property.

Westecunk Creek, also known as West Creek, and Dock Road border the site to the north. It is bordered by Upper Thorofare Creek on the west and Little Egg Harbor Bay on the east, with the refuge on its south. The state plans on dredging the creek in September.

When Westecunk Creek was dredged in the 1960s, spoils from that project were placed on the same site that has garnered concern from the association.

The state Department of Environmental Protection, as part of a $1.75 million project slated to begin in September, wants to again use that land to store spoils. Funding of the dredging project is through a partnership with the state Department of Transportation’s Office of Maritime Resources.

The association wants the DOT, which owns the land, to test it for contaminants. Agency officials plan on testing the site for contaminants in May, said Erin Phalon, a DOT spokeswoman. She added the property is not part of the Forsythe Refuge.

“It is not part of the refuge and was not when DOT purchased it from a private owner” in September 2006, Phalon said.

The DEP has not yet issued a contract for the dredging, said Larry Hajna, a DEP spokesman. He added the agency will be exploring options that will address the residents’ concerns.

In addition, “any future dredge materials stored on that site will be clean,” Phalon said.

But that’s not good enough for the Edwin B. Forsythe Wildlife Refuge Residents Association, Lieberman said, fearing that once dredging materials are again stored there, the site will become a location where dredge spoils from other areas will be stored.

“There are certifiable dredge spoilage places in New Jersey. They can barge it anywhere but here,” Lieberman said. “This is a horrible project. With all the wetlands statutes, why make (the Dock Road property) a landfill?”

Hartriono B. Sastrowardoyo: (609) 978-4581 or [email protected]

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    2 months ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    2 months ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    3 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    4 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form