Search Site
Menu
Read About the Cell Tower

September 03, 2008

Private property to house cell antennas

by Daniel O’Keefe

At the Board of Adjustment attorney’s recommendation, Rutherford officials are considering altering the borough’s ordinance governing the placement of cell towers and antennae. The proposed change would make private and public-owned property equally eligible for wireless communication equipment.

In a letter dated July 15, 2008 from Board of Adjustment attorney Gary Cucchiara, he states, “In Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Borough of Ringwood …the court held that a zoning ordinance which permitted a telecommunications facility only on land owned or leased by the municipality, provided an economic advantage in favor of the municipality which could not advance any legitimate purpose of zoning, and therefore was unlawful and unconstitutional.”

Borough’s hold

Cell towers and antennae are currently only a permitted use on borough property. Everywhere else they are a conditional use. In other words, other than getting borough approval, there are no established restrictions for towers on property owned by the borough, whereas everywhere else towers must meet specified restrictions. This could be construed as giving the borough an advantage of the sort mentioned in Cucchiara’s letter. The proposed changes to the ordinance would strike the section that makes cell towers a permitted use on borough property, making cell towers a conditional use anywhere in the borough.

Application pending

In March, an application was presented by Omnipoint Communications (the company that provides cell service as T-Mobile) to the Board of Adjustment for eight wireless communications antennae to be put on top of the apartment building at 270 Union Ave. Several variances were needed, including one to allow the use in a residential zone, where it is normally prohibited, and one to allow it to exceed the height restrictions for that zone. Over the course of the meeting, several board members inquired as to whether the company had considered placing the antennae on the nearby West End fire station property at the corner of Union Avenue and Wells Place.

Constantine Stamos, who represented Omnipoint at the meeting, said that the company had contacted the borough but that there didn’t appear to be any interest. Furthermore, Syed Mujdaba, an engineer for Omnipoint, indicated that the topography of the fire station site would require a significantly taller tower. Nevertheless, the board has now put off making a decision on the application twice, once in March and again July, requesting that Omnipoint provide more information about other possible locations.

Though he wouldn’t comment on whether the ordinance as it currently stands leaves the borough open to possible litigation from Omnipoint or others, borough attorney Lane Biviano said the proposed changes would be introduced in September.

“Gary [Cucchiara] recommends we do it and I concur,” he said. “[This] doesn’t mean something’s necessarily on the horizon, but it doesn’t hurt to [look at the ordinance] either.”

Height restrictions

The letter also recommends the council consider amending the part of the ordinance, which establishes height restrictions. Currently the ordinance restricts antennae from exceeding the normal height restrictions for the building on which it’s located.

“In practically every application for a wireless communication facility presented to the Board of Adjustment, the selected site involves a building which exceeds the height in its particular zone,” said Cucchiara. The Union Avenue apartment building application currently before the board falls within this description. At just under 48 feet tall, the building itself is already over the 35-foot height restriction for its zone; the tallest proposed cell antennae would extend an additional seven feet above that.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey sets emergency water standards for new chemicals. https://t.co/trgaaLL1mD
    5 months ago
  • How will New Jersey manage stormwater as the climate changes and flooding increases? https://t.co/dhVLALyzZ2
    5 months ago
  • Unprecedented storms are slamming NJ – learn how to be the best advocate for your clients when the next flood hits.… https://t.co/TicH6iAjP0
    5 months ago
  • Trenton Water Works has removed 25 percent of lead pipes throughout its service area. https://t.co/KUvhMsJlvU
    6 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lieberman Blecher and Historic Paulus Hook Association Successfully Save Historic Jersey City Buildings from Demolition

Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich, P.C. successfully represented the Historic Paulus Hook Association before the Jersey City Zoning Board on June 7, protecting two historic buildings from demolition. In 2018, St. Peter’s
Read More
Lieberman Blecher and Historic Paulus Hook Association Successfully Save Historic Jersey City Buildings from Demolition

Supreme Court concludes that attorney review period is not a requirement of absolute auction contracts

On June 9, 2022, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously decided that attorney review period is not a required contractual provision for a residential real estate sale by absolute auction.
Read More
Supreme Court concludes that attorney review period is not a requirement of absolute auction contracts

It Depends on the Language – The Non-Disparagement Clause

How enforceable is a non-disparagement clause in an agreement? As is always the case with any contract or agreement, it depends on the language. On May 31, 2022, the Appellate Division
Read More
It Depends on the Language – The Non-Disparagement Clause

DCA Tries Again to Use RSIS to Limit Municipal Stormwater Controls

By Michele Donato, Esq. and Stuart Lieberman, Esq. In the 1990’s, developers claimed that municipal residential development ordinances lacked uniformity, increased development costs, and caused uncertainty in the development process. In
Read More
DCA Tries Again to Use RSIS to Limit Municipal Stormwater Controls

In The Media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form