- Environmental Law
- Property Development
- Municipal and Government Entity Representation
- Mold Claims Defense For Property Owners
Friday, May 11, 2007
BY LINDA STEIN
HAMILTON — The group Save Hamilton Open Space and 46 residents have filed a lawsuit to block a strip shopping center planned for Route 33.
In the lawsuit, filed last week in Superior Court, SHOS said there was a deed restriction on the property that prevents anything except residential housing from being built on the site.
A 1951 deed that was conveyed to Barton F. and Bernice Francis states “the said lot shall never be used for any purposes other than for residence purposes,” the lawsuit said.
James J. Maguire, who was the executor for Barton Francis, sold the land to Jon/Gul Enterprises in 1995. The 1995 deed did not include the restriction that was a part of the 1951 deed.
The 1951 deed said “no store, shop, saloon, bakery, apartment house or other business enterprise shall be conducted or erected,” the suit said.
“Clearly this covenant was in tended to preserve the residential character of the neighborhood,” the suit said. “It is clear the appli cant is violating the covenant and must withdraw its application to develop the property commercially.”
Developers Jon/Gul Enterprises and Square Properties LLC, plan to build 24,000-square feet of retail space and a 7,500-square-foot building for a credit union on the property at Route 33 and Bisbee Avenue, according to township records.
Thomas J. Orban, a Hamilton real estate agent who represents the developers, said the premise of the suit is wrong.
“We have researched it legally and through a title company and don’t share their opinion,” Orban said. “Anybody can sue anybody at any time.”
Stuart Lieberman, the lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the deed restriction is still in force and the language is very clear.
“It was clear the grantor wanted to have it used for residential property,” Lieberman said. “Unless there is a public policy reason there is no reason to say (the restriction is) not in effect.”
Rocky Swingle, president of SHOS, said residents in the area are very concerned that the proposed development would bring increased flooding. As it is, they had to pump their basements for days after the recent nor’easter, he said.
The small, five-acre parcel is also home of the last remaining stand of native hardwood trees in the area, he said. Some of the trees are 70 feet tall, Swingle said.
“The flooding has really been a problematic issue,” Swingle said. “It’s a development we don’t need that does more harm than good.”
Meanwhile, the Hamilton planning board, which was set to hear testimony about the plan last night, is expected to rule on the proposal by June 30.
Linda Stein may be reached at ls[email protected] or (609) 989-6437.
Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...Read More
CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...Read More
As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.Read More