Search Site
Menu
Hamilton residents sue to halt strip mall

Friday, May 11, 2007

Hamilton residents sue to halt strip mall

BY LINDA STEIN

HAMILTON — The group Save Hamilton Open Space and 46 residents have filed a lawsuit to block a strip shopping center planned for Route 33.

In the lawsuit, filed last week in Superior Court, SHOS said there was a deed restriction on the property that prevents anything except residential housing from being built on the site.

A 1951 deed that was conveyed to Barton F. and Bernice Francis states “the said lot shall never be used for any purposes other than for residence purposes,” the lawsuit said.

James J. Maguire, who was the executor for Barton Francis, sold the land to Jon/Gul Enterprises in 1995. The 1995 deed did not include the restriction that was a part of the 1951 deed.

The 1951 deed said “no store, shop, saloon, bakery, apartment house or other business enterprise shall be conducted or erected,” the suit said.

“Clearly this covenant was in tended to preserve the residential character of the neighborhood,” the suit said. “It is clear the appli cant is violating the covenant and must withdraw its application to develop the property commercially.”

Developers Jon/Gul Enterprises and Square Properties LLC, plan to build 24,000-square feet of retail space and a 7,500-square-foot building for a credit union on the property at Route 33 and Bisbee Avenue, according to township records.

Thomas J. Orban, a Hamilton real estate agent who represents the developers, said the premise of the suit is wrong.

“We have researched it legally and through a title company and don’t share their opinion,” Orban said. “Anybody can sue anybody at any time.”

Stuart Lieberman, the lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the deed restriction is still in force and the language is very clear.

“It was clear the grantor wanted to have it used for residential property,” Lieberman said. “Unless there is a public policy reason there is no reason to say (the restriction is) not in effect.”

Rocky Swingle, president of SHOS, said residents in the area are very concerned that the proposed development would bring increased flooding. As it is, they had to pump their basements for days after the recent nor’easter, he said.

The small, five-acre parcel is also home of the last remaining stand of native hardwood trees in the area, he said. Some of the trees are 70 feet tall, Swingle said.

“The flooding has really been a problematic issue,” Swingle said. “It’s a development we don’t need that does more harm than good.”

Meanwhile, the Hamilton planning board, which was set to hear testimony about the plan last night, is expected to rule on the proposal by June 30.

Linda Stein may be reached at [email protected] or (609) 989-6437.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    2 months ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    2 months ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    3 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    4 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form