Search Site
Menu
Decision delayed once again on North Bruns. farm’s fate

12/12/07

Decision delayed once again on North Bruns. farm’s fate

By RICHARD KHAVKINE
Staff Writer

NORTH BRUNSWICK — A decision on the fate of the 70-acre Pulda farm has again been postponed.

A ruling on a motion by attorneys representing the defendant, Edgewood Properties, that seeks documents from a citizens group fighting to preserve the farm as open space has been pushed back. The motion was scheduled to be heard today in Monmouth County Superior Court, where the case was transfered in January. A new hearing date has not yet been set.

This is the fourth such motion by attorneys for Edgewood, Jack Morris’ Piscataway-based development company.

Attorneys for Edgewood are seeking 21 documents related to a purported verbal settlement between the parties.

The plaintiffs and their attorney, Stuart Lieberman, though, have said that turning over the documents would compromise attorney-client privileges.

While an initial motion resulted in plaintiffs’ attorneys turning over some documents, two subsequent motions have since been denied.

The citizens group initiated a lawsuit challenging a 2004 township action that amended North Brunswick’s master plan to allow for redevelopment of the Pulda Farm into an age-restricted housing complex of about 325 units. Prior to that change, the farm was designated for low-density residential and recreational uses.

The citizens group said the proposal was put forward without significant enough input from residents. The complaint, filed over three years ago, contends that the rezoning ordinance did not comply with normal procedures for adopting zoning ordinances.

The group said that in addition to ridding the township of its last pristine piece of property, the development would worsen traffic jams on Route 130 and unnecessarily burden Farrington Lake, which borders the property.

A state Appellate Court in January found that a Middlesex County trial court did not have sufficient evidence to have approved a purported settlement between Morris and the nonprofit group, Residents Allied Against High Density Housing.

The appellate panel also ruled that the case be heard in Monmouth County Superior Court since one of the attorneys for Morris and Edgewood, Doug Wolfson, is a former Middlesex County Superior Court judge.

The January ruling in effect reinstated the lawsuit brought by the ad hoc residents’ group.

The suit also names the township’s council and planning board as defendants.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    2 months ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    2 months ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    3 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    4 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form