Search Site
Attorneys seek state records on bridge project

Attorneys seek state records on bridge project


Law firm: Four-lane roadway would destroy character of towns

An attorney for Citizens for Rational Coastal Development, a local group that opposes the N.J. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) proposal to demolish the existing 75-year-old drawbridge that connects Sea Bright and Highlands and replace it with a fixed bridge, that is 38 feet higher, said Monday that his firm will seek all documents relating to the project’s planning process from the N.J. Department of Transportation, the N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, and the boroughs of Sea Bright and Highlands.

Joshua Levy, an attorney in the law firm of Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich the firm hired by the local group, said that the information would be requested under the state’s Open Public Records Act and would extend back 15 years.

“The project will affect a lot of people,” Levy said, adding that the information is being sought to find what the state considered and what actions were taken in deciding on the final proposal for the bridge.

He said the law firm is working with the state on the request, including how much will be charged to obtain the information. The state is asking to be paid more than just the cost of copying the information, Levy said, and wants to charge also for administrative costs.

A press release issued by the group and Stuart Lieberman, a partner in the law firm, said Citizens for Rational Coastal Development hired the law firm “to file the necessary legal action” concerning the proposed bridge demolition.

The group, the statement said, is “not opposed to the rehabilitation of the Twin Lights Bridge in order to enhance both access to Sandy Hook and public safety. They are advocating for a project which honors the existing viewscape and that is sensitive to the environment.”

Lieberman also said in the press release that his clients believe that a proposal to widen Ocean Avenue in downtown Sea Bright and the construction of the new bridge would leave the DOT “poised to create what amounts to a superhighway through Sea Bright and Monmouth Beach that would destroy the unique character of these communities and local neighborhood.”

The replacement of the existing bridge with one that will be 30 feet higher has met with resistance from both Sea Bright and Highlands. The borough councils in both towns passed resolutions opposing the proposed new bridge.

The Sea Bright resolution states, “The information regarding the need for the destruction of the Highlands to Sea Bright Draw Bridge that was provided to the public by the New Jersey Department of Transportation, has been called into question and is reportedly different from the information provided to the government.”

Both boroughs retained Janine Bauer, an attorney who concentrates in transportation and environmental land use law, to represent them in their quest to block the demolition of the bridge.

On Tuesday, Bauer said that she would be submitting information to the DEP concerning the DOT’s request for a permit to replace the bridge.

In January, Amy Cradic, assistant commissioner of the DEP, said in a letter to the DOT that the department was “temporarily denying” the permit to remove the drawbridge and replace it with a fixed span.

Cradic said she was “clear that the existing bridge fails to provide a safe and reliable crossing,” and that “NJDOT has demonstrated to my satisfaction, that rehabilitating the existing bridge … is simply not economically and technically feasible.”

But she said she wanted “additional justification on NJDOT’s preferred 65-foot-high replacement bridge,” as the only “feasible and prudent alternative to addressing the existing problems with the Route 36 Bridge.”

An advisory board of the DEP, the N.J. Historic Sites Council, has recommended that the DEP deny the DOT’s application to replace the existing bridge because the new bridge would have an adverse effect on the views of and from the Twin Lights, which is a National Historic Landmark.

The council also said the DOT’s permit application “failed to demonstrate” that rehabilitating the existing bridge would not be “prudent and feasible, thereby avoiding the adverse effect to Twin Lights.”

In her letter, Cradic said she wanted information about why one alternative submitted by the DOT, a 55-foot-high movable bridge, would not be “a feasible and prudent alternative.”

She also asked for specific information “on the effect of the Twin Light’s viewshed of both the 55-foot-high and 65-foot-high replacement bridge, and on the NJDOT’s current policy with respect to the construction of new movable bridges.”

Cradic asked the DOT to submit the information she requested within 60 days.

DEP Commissioner Lisa P. Jackson will make the decision on the DOT’s permit request.

On Tuesday, Darlene Yuhas, a spokeswoman for the DEP, said the commissioner’s decision would be announced shortly.

Shirley Olman, Highlands, a member of the citizens group, said Monday that the organization will respond when Jackson’s decision is made.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • Unprecedented storms are slamming NJ – learn how to be the best advocate for your clients when the next flood hits.…
    1 day ago
  • Trenton Water Works has removed 25 percent of lead pipes throughout its service area.
    2 weeks ago
  • Opposition grows to big warehouses in small NJ towns.
    2 weeks ago
  • Groups plead with Governor Murphy to stop plans for new gas-fired power plant along the Passaic River in Newark.
    2 weeks ago

Recent Blog Posts

Registration for the NJSBA Flood Summit on January 26th

Register Now for NJSBA Flood Summit, January 26 9:00am to 11:30 via Zoom Stuart Lieberman, Esq. of Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich PC will moderate the virtual CLE, which will train advocates on
Read More
Registration for the NJSBA Flood Summit on January 26th

Governor Murphy Blocks Vote on Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission for a More Indepth Review of Its Effects on the Environment

On January 13, 2022, Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission was to vote on a contract to build a $180 million back up generating power plant for its sewage treatment facility in
Read More
Governor Murphy Blocks Vote on Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission for a More Indepth Review of Its Effects on the Environment

Environmental Insurance Dispute to be Heard in New Jersey courts

On December 30, 2021 the Appellate Division of the Superior Court decided Getty Prop. Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. Getty Properties Corp. (“Getty”) filed an appeal
Read More
Environmental Insurance Dispute to be Heard in New Jersey courts

Governor Murphy’s NJDEP Proposes New Rule to Limit Carbon Dioxide Emissions

New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy’s administration proposed a new rule to combat greenhouse gas emissions, just before the start of his second term in office. The New Jersey Department of
Read More
Governor Murphy’s NJDEP Proposes New Rule to Limit Carbon Dioxide Emissions

In The Media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form