Search Site
Menu
Residents sue to reverse project approval

Friday, December 23, 2005

Residents sue to reverse project approval

BY MATTHEW J. DOWLING
Star-Ledger Staff

Franklin Twp. council accused of illegal vote on big development

A group of Franklin Township residents filed suit against the municipality and a prominent builder seeking to overturn township council approval for a development that could include up to 864 homes and a retail shopping district.

The housing portion of the project along Bennetts Lane and Route 27 was excluded from the master plan approved by the township planning board on Dec. 7, according to the lawsuit filed this week by Franklin Residents Against Improper Development, or FRAID.

But the township council voted to reinstate the development before it adopted the master plan, a move the citizens group says violates state laws.

“Only a planning board may approve a municipal master plan and any of its elements,” the lawsuit filed by Princeton-based attorney Stuart Lieberman states. “The governing body knew that what it was doing was without authority, and yet due to apparent and severe political pressure … this governing body did the wrong thing by ignoring the law.”

Township Attorney Louis Rainone could not be reached for comment late yesterday.

The lawsuit also lists the developer, M&M at Bennetts Lane, as a defendant. The company is run by Middlesex County developer Jack Morris, whose political connections have linked his name to a recent federal corruption probe into the business dealings of former state Sen. John Lynch.

The project between Veronica Avenue and Bennetts Lane would include 158 affordable units under state Council on Affordable Housing guidelines, in addition to 305,713 square feet of retail space anchored by a Home Depot.

FRAID claims the site is unsuitable for development because of sensitive streams, wetlands and habitat for the endangered red-shouldered hawk. Most of those involved with the citizens group live within 200 feet of the proposed project.

“The property in question is one of the least environmentally suited properties that one can locate for this kind of intensive project,” states the lawsuit, filed in Superior Court in Somerville. Traffic on congested Route 27 also remains a concern for the group.

The inclusion of the project in the township’s master plan came after finger-pointing among planning board members who claimed behind-the-scenes bullying by Councilwoman Ellen Ritchie. She serves on the planning board and township council.

Planning Board member Michael Orsini claimed Ritchie threatened his political career if he voted against including the development, an account confirmed by board member Joe Danielsen.

Ritchie publicly denied the allegation as “outrageous” and “obvious lies.” She refused to recuse herself from votes concerning the development, despite objections by a FRAID attorney at both meetings earlier this month.

“The fact that she has remained involved has poisoned the entire process to the point that the governing body’s (approval) resolution must be invalid,” the lawsuit states.

Matthew J. Dowling covers Somerset County courts.
He may be reached at [email protected] or (908) 429-9929.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill. https://t.co/P8ybU2UrtD
    1 month ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits. https://t.co/jYo1yCwTOa
    1 month ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast. https://t.co/S4CDX5DMS0
    2 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline. https://t.co/aDYHr4nhal
    3 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form