Search Site
Menu
Board advises not to allow billboards

12/21/2006

Board advises not to allow billboards

By Cara Latham
Staff Writer

Controversial debate about billboards still ongoing

MANSFIELD – The Planning Board on Monday unanimously voted against recommending that the Township Committee approve a proposed ordinance that could allow billboards on Interstate 295 in Hedding.

But the ordinance is expected to receive its second reading on Dec. 27, when members of the public will be able to comment on it.

The issue has been controversial in the village of Hedding, where two 60-foot signs were proposed by Cherry Hill-based Interstate Outdoor Advertising. Residents who oppose the proposal say it would damage the historic village’s beauty and property values. Proponents have pointed out that the signs could be a tax benefit to the township.

Two billboards also have been proposed along the N.J. Turnpike’s Pennsylvania Extension.

Township Administrator Joe Broski said the ordinance would increase the height limit over what is currently allowed. Two of the billboards proposed to be along I-295 would be 60 feet high, while two others in a different zoning area in the township would be 90 feet, he said.

Other municipalities receive about $3,500 per billboard a year. This means that the tax benefit for Mansfield would total about $14,000 if four billboards are placed within township borders, he said.

Some residents who opposed the ordinance have formed an informal group.

Hedding resident Claudia Teal, a member of the Concerned Citizens of Mansfield group, who attended Monday’s meeting, said that even though the Planning Board recommended that the Township Committee not approve the ordinance, the battle isn’t over.

“This is a first-round win, but round two will come up next Wednesday, when the Township Committee is going to supposedly listen to us again,” she said. “We have to go back and make our case again.”

The group hired land-use attorney Stuart Lieberman, of Princeton, to represent it, she said, adding that the Planning Board meeting was very cordial in that residents opposing the ordinance presented their case civilly, and that Planning Board Chairman Fred Clark commended both Planning Board members and residents on their behavior.

However, knowing that the Township Committee is not obligated to follow the Planning Board’s recommendation is “disheartening,” said Ms. Teal.

“We see the nonsense of these billboards, but a lot of people are not seeing the whole viewpoint and what these things are going to look like,” she said.

Committeewoman Terri Tallon Hammill said the Planning Board’s recommendation has not influenced how she may vote on Dec. 27 because she was against the ordinance from the beginning.

“I was not in favor of the change at all to begin with,” she said. “I just don’t think that any of this is in compliance with our Master Plan, and I don’t think it’s something that we want to see in Mansfield.”

Committeeman Jaime Devereaux said the Planning Board’s recommendation will have a large part in his decision, but that “I just have to listen to what the residents have to say, and talk to the committee.”

Committeeman Kenneth Denti echoed that sentiment.

“Obviously we value the opinion of the Planning Board,” he said. “I’m certainly going to take their recommendation into consideration in making a final decision here, as well as the opinions expressed by the residents so far.”

Copyright 2006 Register News

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New report finds that significant offshore wind capacity exists along the Atlantic coast. https://t.co/EQG8d5VMw2
    3 weeks ago
  • The Murphy Administration plans to spend $200 million on wind port. https://t.co/Se09U5ZHvy
    1 month ago
  • NJDEP aims to simplify permitting process. https://t.co/UTm92DtrAC
    1 month ago
  • U.S. Supreme Court will hear PennEast Pipeline appeal of New Jersey eminent domain dispute. https://t.co/AqqvTw1QD2
    2 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Environmental remediation timeframes extended again in February 2021 due to COVID-19

Throughout the COVID-19 public health emergency, keeping up with deadlines and time frames has been a difficult task for many. The State of New Jersey as well as the New
Read More
Environmental remediation timeframes extended again in February 2021 due to COVID-19

New Jersey Courts Make it Easier for Commercial Landlords to Change the Locks and for Lenders to Foreclose

The COVID pandemic began in March of 2020 and placed many individuals, businesses and mortgage lenders in circumstances which seemingly only ever existed in their wildest dreams. Among those impacted
Read More
New Jersey Courts Make it Easier for Commercial Landlords to Change the Locks and for Lenders to Foreclose

Changes to Phase I Environmental Site Assessment standards may change federal environmental due diligence requirements.

At both the state and federal levels, purchasers of commercial property are required to perform certain environmental investigations in order to shield themselves from liability for contamination found after the
Read More
Changes to Phase I Environmental Site Assessment standards may change federal environmental due diligence requirements.

Appeals Court Critical of Law Firm’s “Scorched Earth” Collected Tactics in Landlord Tenant Case

Law firms hired by landlords in collection actions against tenants can be liable to pay the tenant both statutory penalties and attorneys fees if they use improper collection practices. That’s
Read More
Appeals Court Critical of Law Firm’s “Scorched Earth” Collected Tactics in Landlord Tenant Case

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form