Search Site
Menu

Environmental Citizen Suit Rosses Because Notice Was Not Sufficient

Under both state and federal law here in New Jersey, parties are entitled to file lawsuits against polluters using the environmental laws of the state. These cases are frequently called citizens suits, and in these cases private citizens act in the stead  of the Attorney General and enforce state and federal laws usually enforced by  the Attorney General.
The idea of these laws is that there is a recognition that the government has limited resources and that there are certain kinds of violations that need to be filed by citizens under these laws. In other words, the government simply can’t tackle every single issue.
In order for these cases to go forward, the plaintiff, in other words the one who is alleging that the other party is violating environmental laws, must first send a notice. If it’s under state law the notice is  sent under the New Jersey environmental rights act. If it’s under federal law the various federal programs have their own citizen suit provisions. One of them, one which has been used quite a lot over the years, is the clean water act which has its own citizen suit provisions.
In order to pursue a claim in federal court under the clean water act, a notice must be sent to the alleged polluter that provides fairly specific information. In general, this includes  the statue being violated and the specifics of the violation. Failure to file an adequate notice can result in dismissal of the lawsuit.
Which is the hard learned lesson that the plaintiffs did realize in the case of Shark River cleanup coalition versus Township of Wall. In this case, the Shark River coalition alleged that the municipality had violated certain laws which resulted in discharges into the Shark River. These were discharges of alleged pollutants. The municipality sought to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the notice was not sufficient enough.
The trial court agreed and just recently the federal appeals court concurred with the trial court decision that the matter should be dismissed because the notice was not adequate.
Interestingly, the Court of Appeals agreed based on slightly different grounds than the trial court. But in general both courts took issue with the specificity of the notice.
 What is the take away: citizen groups seeking to file these citizen group lawsuits must make sure that their notice is sufficiently comprehensive. This means that the details must be there. While some decisions suggest that all of the details don’t have to be there, this is a case where it’s much better to be safe than sorry.
Our Attorneys

In The Media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form