Search Site

New Jersey Federal Court to Rehear Religious Freedom in Schools Case After SCOTUS Kennedy Decision

The District Court of New Jersey will reconsider a lawsuit over teaching children about Islam in a middle school “World Cultures and Geography” class, in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 142 S. Ct. 2407 (June 27, 2022).

In Kennedy, the Supreme Court held that a Washington State high school football coach should not have been fired for leading his team in mid-field prayers immediately after games and inviting local media and politicians to attend to watch.

The school district had found that under the district’s policy, the practice violated students’ religious freedom rights and created a safety risk by creating a public spectacle. The Supreme Court held that, since the games had ended when the coach began prayer, his prayers were “private speech, not government speech,” and he was not “acting within the scope of his duties as a coach.”

Therefore, the Supreme Court held that the school district’s policy had violated his right to free exercise of religion by prohibiting him from leading prayer after football games.

The test for determining whether a law sufficiently distinguished between church and state was previously explained in Lemon v, Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), which required a court to examine a law’s purposes, effects, and potential for entanglement with religion, and whether the action could be considered an “endorsement” of religion. In Kennedy, the Supreme Court rejected this test without setting forth any clear new test, only noting that religious exercise cannot be “coerced.”

In Hilsenrath v. School District of the Chathams, D.N.J. No. 2-18-cv-00966, a mother filed suit against the school district, claiming her seventh-grader (now a senior in high school) was subject to proselytizing about Islam in her middle school “World Cultures and Geography” class, favoring Islam over Christianity and Judaism. U.S. District Judge Kevin McNulty dismissed the suit in 2020, finding the school was teaching, not indoctrinating. Judge McNulty explained, “[F]or secular educators to teach and study about such [religious] statements is not to espouse them, or to proselytize.” But on July 20, the Third Circuit vacated the Hilsenrath judgment and remanded it to the District Court “for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Kennedy v. Bremerton Sch. Dist.” The Third Circuit’s order does not say what the District Court should do on remand, only that it should consider the case.

This is only one of what will surely be many decisions to be reconsidered around the country in the wake of Kennedy, now that the U.S. Supreme Court has elevated the free-exercise rightand rejected the established Lemon test. Should the District of New Jersey hold that teaching about Islam in this manner constitutes impermissible religious speech, it would cause a large  shift in the ability of public schools to educate students about world religions and cultures, especially those that are not Christianity or Judaism.


Search terms:  religious freedom, religious freedom of Islam, free exercise of religion, religion in schools, separation of church and state, religious speech, religion in public schools

Our Attorneys

In The Media

  • On the Run: Runner/lawyer DeBord out to protect the environment she loves

    Bucks County Herald, January 4, 2024

    When Brittany DeBord runs along the Delaware River canal towpath or on the trails of Tyler State Park, she doesn’t just appreciate the natural beauty of the...

    Read More
  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form