Search Site
Menu

NJ and NY Courts side with insurance companies over hotels concerning certain COVID-related claims

As the COVID-19 pandemic forced shutdowns across the world, the hospitality business was amongst the hardest hit industries in terms of economic loss. In response, some hotels have filed insurance claims under their property and business income insurance in hopes of recuperating some of these losses. Courts are now tasked with evaluating the unprecedented issue of whether the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are covered under the language of certain insurance policies. A New Jersey court recently dismissed claims brought by various hotel owners under numerous different insurance policies.

On October 5, 2021, the Superior Court of New Jersey granted a motion to dismiss in favor of multiple insurance companies dismissing plaintiff hotels’ claims for loss due to the COVID-19 shutdowns. The plaintiff hotels claimed “direct physical loss and damage,” loss of use, and a loss of ingress/egress. The Court opined that none of these claims provided coverage. The “direct physical loss and damage” provision did not apply ultimately because the COVID-19 virus did not cause any physical damage to the structure. The Court also found that the language of the relevant insurance policy did not provide coverage for “loss of use.” Finally, the Court decided that the loss of ingress/egress provision did not apply because the government shutdowns were not an adequate showing of impairment of the ingress/egress to the plaintiffs’ businesses.

The Court did leave some hope for the hotel claimants. In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs made claims under a “contagious disease” provision in one of their policies. The plaintiffs had not yet made this claim prior to presenting it in court. Therefore, the Court stated that the contagious disease claim should be dismissed without prejudice because the insurance company had not yet had the ability to evaluate and make a coverage determination on this claim. The Court noted that this coverage determination cannot be made based on the general shutdowns and emergency orders widely applicable to the State or country as a whole, but rather that each claim must be evaluated on an individual basis considering the specific circumstances relevant to each business and location.

You can read the Court’s full opinion here.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • Murphy Administration releases mapping tool to help NJ residents identify lead exposure risks in housing. https://t.co/oRL7gPVoeq
    1 month ago
  • DEP urged to set tough limit on 1,4-dioxane in drinking water. https://t.co/UESauZowsJ
    4 months ago
  • Beach access issue returns in Cape May County beach community, near the location of a similar issue that was litiga… https://t.co/tWOMcfTqwM
    4 months ago
  • Another effort to make the Delaware Water Gap a national park is underway. https://t.co/C00NZ43nZU
    4 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Appellate Division Declines to Allow Developer’s Four-Month-Late DOT Permit Appeal, Citing No Change in Circumstances

A Maple Shade Township developer’s appeal of permit conditions was untimely when they appealed four months past the deadline and without any change in circumstances justifying deadline relaxation, the Appellate
Read More
Appellate Division Declines to Allow Developer’s Four-Month-Late DOT Permit Appeal, Citing No Change in Circumstances

The Friendly Neighborhood Scheme

You have lived happily in your home for years, content with the fact that all the houses on your street appear the same from the outside. A deed restriction that
Read More
The Friendly Neighborhood Scheme

NJDEP Required to Implement Some Portions of Governor Murphy’s Environmental Justice Law Immediately

On September 22, 2021, NJDEP Commissioner Shawn LaTourette issued Administrative Order No. 2021-25, requiring the Department to apply environmental justice standards to permit applications. While the Environmental Justice Law, signed
Read More
NJDEP Required to Implement Some Portions of Governor Murphy’s Environmental Justice Law Immediately

Manalapan Cemetery’s Application for Crematorium Accessory Use Requires Zoning Board Approval, Appellate Division Holds

Even though a crematorium performs a similar function to a traditional cemetery, a pre-existing nonconforming cemetery cannot add one to its grounds, extending its nonconformity, without Zoning Board approval. In Old
Read More
Manalapan Cemetery’s Application for Crematorium Accessory Use Requires Zoning Board Approval, Appellate Division Holds

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form