Search Site
Menu

Environmental Hearing Requests by Third Parties: An Update

In 2010 this author contributed an article discussing the difficulty that anyone other than an applicant had in administratively contesting a permit. Stuart J. Lieberman and Shari M. Blecher, “It’s No Party for Third Parties,” 200 N.J.L.J. 1, 1-2 (2010). Things have not improved.

In two recent cases, the Appellate Division made clear that third parties should not expect an OAL hearing. The first is In re Challenge to the Denial of the Request for Adjudicatory Hearing & the Grant of CAFRA Permit Regarding Mordechai Sternstein c/o GDMS Holdings, No. A-3561-18, 2021 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1214 (App. Div. Jun. 22, 2021). Where the court briefly reviewed “the record in light of the applicable legal precedents” and easily affirmed a denial of a non-applicant’s hearing request. Id. at *10.

In the second, In re Truesdale, No. A-5696-18, 2021 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1592 (Jul. 29, 2021), the court upheld the DEP’s denial of a non-applicant’s request for a hearing. Here, the court considered the “record and applicable legal standards,” and given the “compelling precedents” determined that the appellant’s arguments in support of its request for an adjudicatory hearing fell short ….” Id. at *5-*7.

While non-applicants may be able to seek and sometimes obtain some form of relief from the Appellate Division on a direct appeal, this avenue is often lacking because there is no ability to engage in discovery and to create a record in the Appellate Division. When the ability to create an administrative record is severely lessened, full and meaningful appellate review is not possible.

Compared with traditional land use law, where neighbors and other objectors may fully participate in Planning Board and zoning hearings, the inequality is most glaring. It thus seems illogical that applicants for permits from State agencies, including environmental permits from DEP and other agencies, have what is practically an exclusive right to a hearing if an application is denied. At the same time, neighbors with legitimate grievances related to a permit application and approval are locked out of the process.

*** This is a synopsis of an article published in the September 2, 2021 edition of the New Jersey Law Journal. The article was written by Stuart Lieberman, Esq. of Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich and Jordan Asch Esq. of Asch Legal LLC.

Let’s Get Started!
Attorney Advertising.
216 Westwood Ave #59
Westwood NJ, 07675
(732) 672-1681
[email protected]
LinkedIn
Twitter

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • LBS is proud to have been a part of this outstanding resolution. https://t.co/6Zp3Rby0Rz
    2 days ago
  • New Jersey sets emergency water standards for new chemicals. https://t.co/trgaaLL1mD
    1 year ago
  • How will New Jersey manage stormwater as the climate changes and flooding increases? https://t.co/dhVLALyzZ2
    1 year ago
  • Unprecedented storms are slamming NJ – learn how to be the best advocate for your clients when the next flood hits.… https://t.co/TicH6iAjP0
    1 year ago

Recent Blog Posts

When A First Right of Refusal Is Too Late

On December 22, 2022, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division decided the case Saadia Square LLC v. SM Logistics Member LLC et. al. This case arises out of a
Read More
When A First Right of Refusal Is Too Late

Indemnification Provision Entitles Former Condominium Association Trustee to Recover Certain Fees and Costs for First-Party Claim

Last week, New Jersey’s Appellate Division found that a former trustee of a condominium association’s board was entitled to recover certain fees and costs pursuant to the association’s indemnification provision. In
Read More
Indemnification Provision Entitles Former Condominium Association Trustee to Recover Certain Fees and Costs for First-Party Claim

Court Affirms DEP Direct Oversight of Remediation Efforts of PFAS Polluting Plant

  This week, in In re Dep't of Envtl. Prot. Direct Oversight Determination, No. A-0635-20, 2023 WL-125229 (App. Div. Jan. 9, 2023), New Jersey’s Appellate Division affirmed a Department of Environmental
Read More
Court Affirms DEP Direct Oversight of Remediation Efforts of PFAS Polluting Plant

What to do if a certificate of occupancy has been incorrectly issued?

Town rescinds certificate of occupancy for former motel On January 5, 2023, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division decided the case Department of Community Affairs, etc v. Kenneth D. Roberts, etc. In this case, Defendant
Read More
What to do if a certificate of occupancy has been incorrectly issued?

In The Media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form