Search Site

Environmental Hearing Requests by Third Parties: An Update

In 2010 this author contributed an article discussing the difficulty that anyone other than an applicant had in administratively contesting a permit. Stuart J. Lieberman and Shari M. Blecher, “It’s No Party for Third Parties,” 200 N.J.L.J. 1, 1-2 (2010). Things have not improved.

In two recent cases, the Appellate Division made clear that third parties should not expect an OAL hearing. The first is In re Challenge to the Denial of the Request for Adjudicatory Hearing & the Grant of CAFRA Permit Regarding Mordechai Sternstein c/o GDMS Holdings, No. A-3561-18, 2021 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1214 (App. Div. Jun. 22, 2021). Where the court briefly reviewed “the record in light of the applicable legal precedents” and easily affirmed a denial of a non-applicant’s hearing request. Id. at *10.

In the second, In re Truesdale, No. A-5696-18, 2021 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1592 (Jul. 29, 2021), the court upheld the DEP’s denial of a non-applicant’s request for a hearing. Here, the court considered the “record and applicable legal standards,” and given the “compelling precedents” determined that the appellant’s arguments in support of its request for an adjudicatory hearing fell short ….” Id. at *5-*7.

While non-applicants may be able to seek and sometimes obtain some form of relief from the Appellate Division on a direct appeal, this avenue is often lacking because there is no ability to engage in discovery and to create a record in the Appellate Division. When the ability to create an administrative record is severely lessened, full and meaningful appellate review is not possible.

Compared with traditional land use law, where neighbors and other objectors may fully participate in Planning Board and zoning hearings, the inequality is most glaring. It thus seems illogical that applicants for permits from State agencies, including environmental permits from DEP and other agencies, have what is practically an exclusive right to a hearing if an application is denied. At the same time, neighbors with legitimate grievances related to a permit application and approval are locked out of the process.

*** This is a synopsis of an article published in the September 2, 2021 edition of the New Jersey Law Journal. The article was written by Stuart Lieberman, Esq. of Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich and Jordan Asch Esq. of Asch Legal LLC.

Let’s Get Started!
Attorney Advertising.
216 Westwood Ave #59
Westwood NJ, 07675
(732) 672-1681
[email protected]

Our Attorneys

In The Media

  • On the Run: Runner/lawyer DeBord out to protect the environment she loves

    Bucks County Herald, January 4, 2024

    When Brittany DeBord runs along the Delaware River canal towpath or on the trails of Tyler State Park, she doesn’t just appreciate the natural beauty of the...

    Read More
  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form