Search Site
Menu

States file petition in U.S. Supreme Court over EPA’s Clean Air Act regulations

On June 18, 2021, twenty (20) states along with additional supporters filed a request for appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court that has the potential to affect States’ rights to regulate emissions limits under the Clean Air Act.

Requesting the Supreme Court to hear an appeal involves filing a “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” and those requesting the appeal are called “Petitioners.” The Clean Air Act provides certain powers to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to regulate emissions.

This Petition sums up numerous appeals from lower courts that all question the limits of the EPA’s authority to regulate emissions under the Clean Air Act.

Different sources, as categorized by the Clean Air Act, are regulated differently. For “existing sources,” the Clean Air Act instructs the EPA to create “guidelines,” but allow states to submit their own plans within those guidelines. 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d)(1). According to the Petitioners, the EPA has exceeded this authority by creating binding, nation-wide standards that are beyond the scope of the “guidelines” the EPA is authorized to create.

This concept of the federal government promulgating guidelines and leaving the specific regulations up to the states is known as “cooperative federalism.” The Petitioners argue that the EPA’s current interpretation of section 7411(d) ignores the cooperative federalism approach prescribed by the Clean Air Act and gives too much regulatory power to the EPA. Petitioners claim that the nationwide performance standards “deprive States of all implementation and decision making power in creating their Section 111(d) plans.”

It is still to be seen whether the Supreme Court will hear this case. If so, it would clear up many questions about the seemingly blurry line between federal and state regulatory powers under the Clean Air Act. You can keep updated with the docket as well as read the full petitioner here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-1780.html

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • DEP urged to set tough limit on 1,4-dioxane in drinking water. https://t.co/UESauZowsJ
    2 months ago
  • Beach access issue returns in Cape May County beach community, near the location of a similar issue that was litiga… https://t.co/tWOMcfTqwM
    3 months ago
  • Another effort to make the Delaware Water Gap a national park is underway. https://t.co/C00NZ43nZU
    3 months ago
  • New Jersey seeks designation of Lower Hackensack River as a federal Superfund site. https://t.co/czOI3hDNb2
    3 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Don’t Let a Leaking Heating Oil Tank Ruin Your Life

Every environmental lawyer deals with leaking heating oil homeowner tanks. They are very frightening to homeowners who have never experienced an environmental problem before. Leaking heating oil tanks can cost
Read More
Don’t Let a Leaking Heating Oil Tank Ruin Your Life

Appeals Court Allows Strict Liability Claims to Proceed Against Large New Jersey Refinery

For years many New Jersey lawyers understood that the mere storage of petroleum was not an abnormally dangerous activity. That is an important concept because those who engage in abnormally
Read More
Appeals Court Allows Strict Liability Claims to Proceed Against Large New Jersey Refinery

RLUIPA lawsuits and free beach parking

RLUIPA defense counsel took note of a Florida case earlier this year that questioned whether free beach access constituted a sincerely held religious belief under the RLUIPA statute. The case,
Read More
RLUIPA lawsuits and free beach parking

Appellate Division Confirms Accessory Building’s Unused 80-Year-Old Plumbing Fixtures are Preexisting Nonconformity

Rantz v. Planning Board of the Borough of Bay Head, Docket No. A-2847-19 (App. Div. Sept. 8, 2021) This month, the Appellate Division upheld the Planning Board of the Borough of
Read More
Appellate Division Confirms Accessory Building’s Unused 80-Year-Old Plumbing Fixtures are Preexisting Nonconformity

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form