Search Site

Recent Appellate decision emphasizes the consequences of failing to perform due diligence

In December 2020, the NJ Appellate Division published a decision emphasizing the importance for purchasers of property use their “due diligence” period to learn as much as possible about the property they are purchasing.

In Garden State Investment v. Township of Brick, plaintiffs were purchasers of tax sale certificates. After paying the overdue taxes and commencing foreclosure proceedings, plaintiffs filed suit requesting the paid taxes back and to rescind their tax sale certificate purchases. Plaintiffs’ claim was based on the fact that through a title search, plaintiffs learned that the properties contained a conservation easement. The courts ruled against the plaintiffs, reasoning that the existence of the easement was easily discoverable by a basic title search, which the plaintiffs had plenty of time to perform before commencing their foreclosure actions.

This decision is significant because it highlights the importance for a purchaser to maximize their “due diligence” period when purchasing a property, whether through a tax sale or otherwise. The “due diligence” period in a typical real estate transaction is the time period during which the purchaser is permitted to inspect the property. In many cases, the purchaser is entitled to rescind on the contract to purchase if there are issues uncovered during due diligence that were not previously disclosed. Despite the fact that the plaintiffs in Garden State Investments did some due diligence by physically inspecting the property and examining the tax records, the Court still found that they did not do enough to warrant rescission after the foreclosure actions were commenced.

The due diligence period can be used to discover all types of issues with a property from the existence of easements such as in Garden State Investments to environmental contamination in the soil and groundwater. Purchasers of real property should be sure to use their due diligence period wisely to uncover any unknown issues before purchasing the property.

You can read the full text of Garden State Inv. v. Twp. Of Brick here:

Our Attorneys

In The Media

  • On the Run: Runner/lawyer DeBord out to protect the environment she loves

    Bucks County Herald, January 4, 2024

    When Brittany DeBord runs along the Delaware River canal towpath or on the trails of Tyler State Park, she doesn’t just appreciate the natural beauty of the...

    Read More
  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form