Search Site
Menu

New Jersey Court of Appeals rules in favor of DEP’s ability to create public beach access over private property

In an April 2020 decision of a matter comprised of 63 consolidated cases, the New Jersey Court of Appeals affirmed that the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) has a right to conduct a regulatory taking of individuals’ private property for certain federally funded projects. State v. 1 Howe St. Bay Head, LLC, 463 N.J. Super 312 (App. Div. 2020).

The defendants in the consolidated suits are owners of beachfront properties along the Barnegate Peninsula, an area affected by Hurricane Sandy. Since receiving funding from the federal Disaster Relief Appropriations Act of 2013, the NJDEP has been making efforts to repair the damage Hurricane Sandy inflicted on our coastlines. A key requirement for receiving this federal funding is that the funding is used for areas that allow for open public access, and not to benefit private properties. A dune and berm system installation project that would better protect the Barnegat Peninsula coastlines was approved for funding, but required the NJDEP to create easements, or rights of way, over the defendant homeowners’ properties to allow for public beach access.

Regulatory takings, also known as eminent domain takings, occur when a federal or state agency is required to “take” private property for public use – in this case, creating public accessways to the beach. The NJDEP successfully argued that the easements were needed to ensure public access to the beach, which was a requirement to receive federal funding for the coastline protection project. The homeowners challenged the NJDEP’s takings claim, asserting that they had a revetment (another type of storm-protection structure) that sufficiently protected their properties against flooding, thus eliminating the need for this particular project to run through in their area. Their revetment dates back to the 1800s and is 1.8 miles long, while the NJDEP’s project is intended to span 14 miles upon completion. Throughout the existence of this revetment, homeowners have voluntarily hired contractors to maintain it, over time pouring millions of dollars into its preservation.

While the trial court granted the defendant homeowners a plenary hearing to determine whether the homes safeguarded by the revetment were sufficiently protected, it ultimately ended up finding in favor of the NJDEP and the Appellate Court then affirmed. In deciding against the homeowner defendants, the Appellate Court reaffirmed and relied on its holding from a 2017 case (State v. North Beach 1003, LLC, 451 N.J. Super. 214 (App. Div. 2017)) stating that “the public trust doctrine requires that the public have access to the beach when DEP uses public funds to create a dry sand area.”

This project and others like it are expected to continue throughout the coming decades, likely subjecting more homeowners to regulatory takings by the NJDEP. This continued precedent presents difficulty for beachfront property owners when challenging such takings.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • DEP urged to set tough limit on 1,4-dioxane in drinking water. https://t.co/UESauZowsJ
    1 month ago
  • Beach access issue returns in Cape May County beach community, near the location of a similar issue that was litiga… https://t.co/tWOMcfTqwM
    2 months ago
  • Another effort to make the Delaware Water Gap a national park is underway. https://t.co/C00NZ43nZU
    2 months ago
  • New Jersey seeks designation of Lower Hackensack River as a federal Superfund site. https://t.co/czOI3hDNb2
    2 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Environmental Hearing Requests by Third Parties: An Update

In 2010 this author contributed an article discussing the difficulty that anyone other than an applicant had in administratively contesting a permit. Stuart J. Lieberman and Shari M. Blecher, “It’s
Read More
Environmental Hearing Requests by Third Parties: An Update

Hoboken cannot block residential development with new zoning ordinances, Supreme Court holds

In Shipyard Assocs., LP v. City of Hoboken, 242 N.J. 23 (2020), the Supreme Court held that the City of Hoboken could not block a waterfront residential development by enacting
Read More
Hoboken cannot block residential development with new zoning ordinances, Supreme Court holds

Long standing land use attorney Michele Donato joins Princeton’s Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich as “of counsel”

The law firm of Lieberman, Blecher & Sinkevich is  proud to announce that Michele R. Donato, Esq. has become Of Counsel with their firm. Ms. Donato has specialized in land use,
Read More
Long standing land use attorney Michele Donato joins Princeton’s Lieberman Blecher & Sinkevich as “of counsel”

RLUIPA case in SDNY challenges alleged discrimination against Orthodox Jewish community

In December 2020, the Southern District of New York filed a lawsuit under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) against the Village of Airmont. The suit alleges
Read More
RLUIPA case in SDNY challenges alleged discrimination against Orthodox Jewish community

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules

    NJ.com Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form