Search Site
New Jersey Court of Appeals rules in favor of DEP’s ability to create public beach access over private property

In an April 2020 decision of a matter comprised of 63 consolidated cases, the New Jersey Court of Appeals affirmed that the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) has a right to conduct a regulatory taking of individuals’ private property for certain federally funded projects. State v. 1 Howe St. Bay Head, LLC, 463 N.J. Super 312 (App. Div. 2020).

The defendants in the consolidated suits are owners of beachfront properties along the Barnegate Peninsula, an area affected by Hurricane Sandy. Since receiving funding from the federal Disaster Relief Appropriations Act of 2013, the NJDEP has been making efforts to repair the damage Hurricane Sandy inflicted on our coastlines. A key requirement for receiving this federal funding is that the funding is used for areas that allow for open public access, and not to benefit private properties. A dune and berm system installation project that would better protect the Barnegat Peninsula coastlines was approved for funding, but required the NJDEP to create easements, or rights of way, over the defendant homeowners’ properties to allow for public beach access.

Regulatory takings, also known as eminent domain takings, occur when a federal or state agency is required to “take” private property for public use – in this case, creating public accessways to the beach. The NJDEP successfully argued that the easements were needed to ensure public access to the beach, which was a requirement to receive federal funding for the coastline protection project. The homeowners challenged the NJDEP’s takings claim, asserting that they had a revetment (another type of storm-protection structure) that sufficiently protected their properties against flooding, thus eliminating the need for this particular project to run through in their area. Their revetment dates back to the 1800s and is 1.8 miles long, while the NJDEP’s project is intended to span 14 miles upon completion. Throughout the existence of this revetment, homeowners have voluntarily hired contractors to maintain it, over time pouring millions of dollars into its preservation.

While the trial court granted the defendant homeowners a plenary hearing to determine whether the homes safeguarded by the revetment were sufficiently protected, it ultimately ended up finding in favor of the NJDEP and the Appellate Court then affirmed. In deciding against the homeowner defendants, the Appellate Court reaffirmed and relied on its holding from a 2017 case (State v. North Beach 1003, LLC, 451 N.J. Super. 214 (App. Div. 2017)) stating that “the public trust doctrine requires that the public have access to the beach when DEP uses public funds to create a dry sand area.”

This project and others like it are expected to continue throughout the coming decades, likely subjecting more homeowners to regulatory takings by the NJDEP. This continued precedent presents difficulty for beachfront property owners when challenging such takings.

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • The Murphy Administration plans to spend $200 million on wind port.
    5 days ago
  • NJDEP aims to simplify permitting process.
    6 days ago
  • U.S. Supreme Court will hear PennEast Pipeline appeal of New Jersey eminent domain dispute.
    1 month ago
  • Fishing to be allowed in future wind farm off the coast of Atlantic City.
    2 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Recent Appellate decision emphasizes the consequences of failing to perform due diligence

In December 2020, the NJ Appellate Division published a decision emphasizing the importance for purchasers of property use their “due diligence” period to learn as much as possible about the
Read More
Recent Appellate decision emphasizes the consequences of failing to perform due diligence

New Jersey has ambitious goals for emission reductions

New Jersey’s Global Warming Response Act (“GWRA”) calls for New Jersey to decrease its greenhouse gas emissions by 80% from their 2006 levels by 2050. In January 2020, Governor Murphy
Read More
New Jersey has ambitious goals for emission reductions

San Diego Receives Federal Funding to Fight Mexican Sewage

San Diego has just received substantial federal funding from the EPA to address a chronic problem: raw sewage coming from Tijuana Mexico. That sewage has been migrating over the border
Read More
San Diego Receives Federal Funding to Fight Mexican Sewage

New Jersey Supreme Court rules for NJ Transit in insurance claim for damages due to Superstorm Sandy

A New Jersey Supreme Court opinion issued on January 27, 2021 affirmed an Appellate Division decision in favor of NJ Transit over its insurers. In 2012, when Superstorm Sandy hit
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules for NJ Transit in insurance claim for damages due to Superstorm Sandy

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form