Search Site
Toxic Mercury in Gym Flooring Used by Our Children

We have a giant mercury exposure problem in our New Jersey schools. Rubberized flooring found in school gyms cracks over time. And some, not all of the flooring products have been determined to emit mercury when the cracks form. The cracks become a pathway for the mercury to be released into the environment so that our children can inhale it and become poisoned from it.

Testing has been taking place for the past three years to determine which floors are safe and which flooring needs to be replaced. This is a very significant because mercury harms small children and impacts them much more so than it impacts adults.

Mercury is of course naturally occurring. It is (1) persistent in that is really hard to eliminate from the environment, and (2) it causes neurological problems.

Furthermore, our children are especially vulnerable to toxic environmental threats, mercury exposure certainly high on the list of such threats. Their growth and development cycles make them particularly at risk. And certain childhood behaviors, such as hand in mouth behavior, makes children even more vulnerable.
What makes the gym flooring exposure potentially more problematic is that the mercury impacts are culminative. Children already have mercury exposure risk from dental amalgam, take-home exposure from occupationally exposed adults, and accidental exposure. The gym flooring problem only adds to their other sources of mercury exposure.

Washington Township in Gloucester County is reported to be spending $3.2 million to remove its rubberized floors in the gym and all purpose rooms of several schools. Some government officials statewide reportedly claimed that the released levels are low and therefore do not pose a health hazard. But one school reported levels of .74 mg /cubic unit of air and the standard is virtually the same at .8.

According to the NJEA the problem is worsened if the flooring is cracked, the room is hot or poorly ventilated. These seem like the kinds of variables which change often and cannot be readily controlled.

The key is this: no one can tell you that this is safe. Even if levels meet an arbitrary state guideline, the question remains: why should our children be exposed to any of this when it can potentially cause so much permanent harm, when it can be readily avoided, and when the culminative impacts are a real risk.

Some school districts are actively testing and replacing. That is a good start. But any school where exposure may have happened needs to be promptly tested. Two years ago we found out that many students were being lead poisoned in our schools. Some we know are also being mercury poisoned.

Isn’t school supposed to be a safe place where our children can grow and learn?

Our Attorneys

Recent Twitter Posts

  • New Jersey Legislature Passes National Precedent Setting Environmental Justice Bill.
    3 months ago
  • New Jersey files 12 new environmental justice lawsuits.
    3 months ago
  • Plans Underway for Building Offshore Wind Farms Along the New Jersey Coast.
    4 months ago
  • Energy companies cancel construction of Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
    5 months ago

Recent Blog Posts

Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

Owners of older residential properties are likely familiar with the legal requirement to provide warnings concerning the existence of lead. Lead exposure, particularly amongst children, can result in severe, even
Read More
Lead Exposure and Frivolous Litigation

New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Now more than ever, consumer protection is important. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, we see new products on our shelves, promising safe disinfection for hands and surfaces as
Read More
New Jersey Supreme Court rules the PLA does not preempt CFA claims by consumers

Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

In JSTAR, LLC v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Docket No. A-1745-18T1, the Appellate Division in an unpublished decision revisited the issues of notice and a review
Read More
Notices and Appellate Review of a CAFRA Permit

Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

On November 20, 2019, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division, issued an opinion in the matter captioned Lakeview Memorial Park Association v. Burlington County Construction Board
Read More
Preemption Isn’t Always the Answer: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County Law Division highlights the necessary harmony between State legislation and municipal land use ordinances

In the media

  • Gulf Coast Town Center facing foreclosure

    Naples Daily News, September 16, 2015

    Wells Fargo filed a lawsuit Sept. 8 against an affiliate of CBL & Associates, the owners of the decadeold, 1.2 million-square-foot mall in south Fort Myers for a $190.9 million unpaid loan. The center has 94 stores on 204 acres, with such anchors as Super Target, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Marshalls and Costco...

    Read More
  • Town liable for private company's leaking underground tanks, court rules Jul 26, 2017

    CRANFORD -- A couple that owned a businesses in town and became sick from leaking underground tanks owned by an adjacent business can sue the township for damages because the tanks were partially ...

    Read More
  • Dark Waters: How a Class Action Catapulted NJ to Forefront of 'Forever Chemicals' Battle

    NJ Law Journal Jan 09, 2020

    As property owners become increasingly aware of PFAS contamination, and as individuals exposed to PFAS learn of the health risks associated with exposure, liability will likely affect entire supply chains.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Contact Our Firm

Quick Contact Form