HAMILTON -- The group Save Hamilton Open Space and 46 residents have filed a lawsuit to block a strip shopping center planned for Route 33.
In the lawsuit, filed last week in Superior Court, SHOS said there was a deed restriction on the property that prevents anything except residential housing from being built on the site.
A 1951 deed that was conveyed to Barton F. and Bernice
Francis states "the said lot shall never be used
for any purposes other than for residence purposes,"
the lawsuit said.
James J. Maguire, who was the executor for Barton
Francis, sold the land to Jon/Gul Enterprises in 1995.
The 1995 deed did not include the restriction that was a
part of the 1951 deed.
The 1951 deed said "no store, shop, saloon,
bakery, apartment house or other business enterprise
shall be conducted or erected," the suit said.
"Clearly this covenant was in tended to preserve
the residential character of the neighborhood," the
suit said. "It is clear the appli cant is violating
the covenant and must withdraw its application to
develop the property commercially."
Developers Jon/Gul Enterprises and Square Properties
LLC, plan to build 24,000-square feet of retail space
and a 7,500-square-foot building for a credit union on the
property at Route 33 and Bisbee Avenue, according to
township records.
Thomas J. Orban, a Hamilton real estate agent who
represents the developers, said the premise of the suit
is wrong.
"We have researched it legally and through a title
company and don't share their opinion," Orban
said. "Anybody can sue anybody at any time."
Stuart Lieberman, the lawyer for the plaintiffs, said
the deed restriction is still in force and the language is
very clear.
"It was clear the grantor wanted to have it used
for residential property," Lieberman said.
"Unless there is a public policy reason there is no
reason to say (the restriction is) not in effect."
Rocky Swingle, president of SHOS, said residents in the
area are very concerned that the proposed development
would bring increased flooding. As it is, they had to pump
their basements for days after the recent nor'easter,
he said.
The small, five-acre parcel is also home of the last
remaining stand of native hardwood trees in the area, he
said. Some of the trees are 70 feet tall, Swingle said.
"The flooding has really been a problematic
issue," Swingle said. "It's a development
we don't need that does more harm than good."
Meanwhile, the Hamilton planning board, which was set to
hear testimony about the plan last night, is expected to
rule on the proposal by June 30.
Linda Stein may be reached at
lstein@njtimes.com or (609) 989-6437. |