NJ Environmental Litigation Lawyers – Drinking Water Litigation, Brownfields Redevelopment, Historical Preservation, Community Association Representation, Community Objector Work, MTBE Contamination, Mercury Contamination, Leaking Underground Storage Tanks and Toxic Tort. Lieberman & Blecher is a Princeton, NJ environmental law firm practicing Toxic Tort Litigation, Environmental Justice, and New Jersey Historic Preservation.
 
Environmental Attorneys in Princeton, NJ specializing in tort cases, MTBE contamination, Mercury Exposure and Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Princeton Environmental Attorneys with New Jersey Historic Preservation experience as well as Community Association Representation and Community Objector Work. New Jersey Environmental Litigation dealing with toxic tort, drinking water litigation and mercury contamination. Princeton Environmental Attorneys litigating Browfields Redevelopment, Underground Storage Tanks and MTBE Contamination. Lieberman & Blecher delivers results in NJ litigation dealing with toxic tort litigation, mercury exposure and drinking water litigation. Princeton Environmental Attorneys litigating against MTBE and Toxic Tort. Princeton Environmental Lawyers specializing in Community Objector Work (including Cell Tower Opposition), Community Association Representation, Brownfields Redevelopment and Mercury Exposure. NJ Environmental Lawyers specializing in Community Objector Work (including Cell Tower Opposition), Community Association Representation, Brownfields Redevelopment and Mercury Exposure.  
 
 
Friday, December 23, 2005
Residents sue to reverse project approval
BY MATTHEW J. DOWLING
Star-Ledger Staff
Franklin Twp. council accused of illegal vote on big development

A group of Franklin Township residents filed suit against the municipality and a prominent builder seeking to overturn township council approval for a development that could include up to 864 homes and a retail shopping district.

The housing portion of the project along Bennetts Lane and Route 27 was excluded from the master plan approved by the township planning board on Dec. 7, according to the lawsuit filed this week by Franklin Residents Against Improper Development, or FRAID.

But the township council voted to reinstate the development before it adopted the master plan, a move the citizens group says violates state laws.

"Only a planning board may approve a municipal master plan and any of its elements," the lawsuit filed by Princeton-based attorney Stuart Lieberman states. "The governing body knew that what it was doing was without authority, and yet due to apparent and severe political pressure ... this governing body did the wrong thing by ignoring the law."

Township Attorney Louis Rainone could not be reached for comment late yesterday.

The lawsuit also lists the developer, M&M at Bennetts Lane, as a defendant. The company is run by Middlesex County developer Jack Morris, whose political connections have linked his name to a recent federal corruption probe into the business dealings of former state Sen. John Lynch.

The project between Veronica Avenue and Bennetts Lane would include 158 affordable units under state Council on Affordable Housing guidelines, in addition to 305,713 square feet of retail space anchored by a Home Depot.

FRAID claims the site is unsuitable for development because of sensitive streams, wetlands and habitat for the endangered red-shouldered hawk. Most of those involved with the citizens group live within 200 feet of the proposed project.

"The property in question is one of the least environmentally suited properties that one can locate for this kind of intensive project," states the lawsuit, filed in Superior Court in Somerville. Traffic on congested Route 27 also remains a concern for the group.

The inclusion of the project in the township's master plan came after finger-pointing among planning board members who claimed behind-the-scenes bullying by Councilwoman Ellen Ritchie. She serves on the planning board and township council.

Planning Board member Michael Orsini claimed Ritchie threatened his political career if he voted against including the development, an account confirmed by board member Joe Danielsen.

Ritchie publicly denied the allegation as "outrageous" and "obvious lies." She refused to recuse herself from votes concerning the development, despite objections by a FRAID attorney at both meetings earlier this month.

"The fact that she has remained involved has poisoned the entire process to the point that the governing body's (approval) resolution must be invalid," the lawsuit states.

Matthew J. Dowling covers Somerset County courts.
He may be reached at mdowling@starledger.com or (908) 429-9929.


Lieberman & Blecher, P.C.
10 Jefferson Plaza, Suite 100 Princeton, N.J. 08540
Telephone: (732) 355-1311 · Fax: (732) 355-1310 · Email: info@liebermanblecher.com · Website: www.liebermanblecher.com
 
NJ Environmental Attorneys specializing in Community Objector Work (including Cell Tower Opposition), Community Association Representation, Brownfields Redevelopment and Mercury Exposure. Toxic Tort Attorneys for drinking water litigation, MTBE contamination and mercury exposure. Toxic Tort lawyers for drinking water litigation, MTBE contamination and mercury exposure.
'New Public Access Rules Designed to Enhance Beach Access’ by Stuart Lieberman & Shari Blecher from March 31, 2008, New Jersey Law Journal
Judge: Point Beach must maintain lake
Read About a DOT Official's Arrest Relating to Lieberman & Blecher's Highlands-Sea Bright Bridge Case

See why Shari Blecher is one of New Jersey's Super Lawyers
Site Designed and Maintained by Computer Solutions